You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #44: Thanks for your permission. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Thanks for your permission.
It's nice to be able to disagree whenever I want. :)

I want to draw attention to the IF in the para you included in your post. Perhaps the phase wasn't identified as a common one? Again - it would be nice to know if they did pursue this to that end, but I reiterate my point made several posts above - I think it is wrong for you to assume that the only reason the NIST didn't publish anything about this is because they wanted to hide conclusions that disagreed with their hypothesis.

The question about constraints, again, should not be directed to me. I wasn't in charge of either the budget or the schedule for the investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC