Reply #90: OK, I guess. You may or may not have good reason to believe this. [View All]

[mhatrw]

But frankly, it's not something I'm interested in analyzing further for the reasons I've stated above.

Why climb out on this speculative, at least bizarre sounding limb? To pick a fight with other members of your own group?

It's simply counter-productive. Call up each other and email each other if you feel the need to fight about this stuff. Everyone has the right to his own her own favorite "best-reasoned" analysis of the (non)evidence, but these over reaching and frankly over speculative competitive fights seem rather demeaning to any claims of scholarship you, Reynolds or Jones are making.

Is this really so important to be picking sides over? What we are talking about is Level 15.5 MIHOP vs. Level 14 MIHOP. Who really and truly cares? Aren't there reams of more persuasive evidence for criminal negligence, LIHOP and even MIHOP -- including some of your own personal analyses? I mean, you do realize that this is fundamentally a propaganda war? Don't you? Why get into a food fight about tertiary "best guess" speculations? Why put the onus on the Scholars for 9/11 Truth to prove these frankly far out speculations when the onus should be on our government to explain why their story doesn't stand up to scientific, rational and deductive scrutiny?