Reply #72: He's got the right to discuss it. I have the right to question his [View All]

[motocicleta]

interest. And you have the right to snarkily question my question. Thanks for the breakdown.

My point, in case you couldn't follow it, is that although McKinney was mentioned in the verbose Ruppert piece, I think it is fair to characterize the poster as 'injecting' her into a thread that can only best be described as barely tangential to her, then making a huge stink over her. In that light, I think we have a right to question why one has taken a barely tangential topic and turned it into a point over which to fight. Notice, I didn't respond to the first mention of McKinney, I only responded after it had turned into a nasty little hissyfit on the part of the 'injector'.

You may have a wonderful legacy, but I find you lacking in your treatment of my logic. I beg your pardon if that is simply an aberration.
Cheers,
Matt