Reply #21: Big ??? [View All]

[medienanalyse]

"So your assumption ... is obviously mistaken."
"could have" is no basis for any conclusion"

Pardon me - I do not understand your point.

My point is
- that one explosion could have incended all the other bombs too.
- or: some of the other bombs
- or mechanically disengaged other bombs

Whatever. To spread the alleged controlle demolition over one hour
with a lot of imponderabilities - including the point of impact, kerosine
dripping here and there - cannot be in the sense of a controlled
demolition. Just the arguments retold here by CD-theorists turn
against themselves. If it were bombs then not controlled. If not
controlled then senseless to bring the towers down. But this could
have been anticipated by the alleged perpetrators. So it was
senseless to plant bombs because in the end it would have been a
"good luck" game.

Take it al together: every single event fits into the pancake theory and
the focus stays on the planes. There is no "need" for a CD theory
except to take the focus off the planes and off air-policing and off
from government "failures".

The deep sense of the CD theory -willingly or for sure 99% unwillingly - is to support the Bushist fairy tales.