Reply #14: Welcome to DU, Bos, and to the Dungeon. You were quick to find us. [View All]

[petgoat]

The tapes and the testimony are evidence of explosives, not proof.
The proof of what happened--the WTC steel--was of course quickly
destroyed by the authorities.

Are you saying that controlled demolition could not have been
accomplished by planting charges in floors 1-27 and 45-47? If
the building could fall straight down from a natural collapse
without charges on the SB floors, I suppose it could fall from
a demolition without them. Did you consider that the building
was evacuated for six hours? That prepared charges hidden on
the 46th floor could have been installed on SB floors in that time?

talk with someone in the engineering department. These people
aren't fearing for their lives or jobs

They're fearing for federal research funding. They're also highly
motivated to rationalize their refusal to open the can of worms
these collapses represent. Without access to the blueprints and
without the luxury of hundreds of hours of study, how can they be
expected to even comment on a $20 million gov't study, let alone
challenge it? Dr. Eagar's speculations have proved to be a
great embarrassment to him.

There's a reason why Steven Jones won't have his work peer
reviewed in an engineering journal. He knows it will get ripped
apart.

Your frienda are certainly free to write their own paper, to comment
in this forum, and to comment at st911 http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Comments_Jones_05May2006.html

The Scholars' debate for September was postponed until March because
they could not find anyone willing to defend the official story.
Perhaps your friends could help there.