Reply #81: That's rational? Yikes. [View All]

[Ka hrnt]

Let's see...he originally states it looked and could have been done with explosives. After further analysis he states explosives didn't cause the collapse. So you latch onto the quotes about what "here's what could" have happened and ignore the "on further review, here's what really happened" parts. You know, it could have been that a really large person with bad gas happened to let one go on the ~90th floor, and when the flames got up there that methane EXPLODED, causing the collapse. The explosion catapulted him OUT of the first tower and into the second. Later, after waking up, he had a sort of "morning gas" and let another go in the second tower, as evidenced below. (Mass media's attempt at covering this up evidenced in bottom of picture. This fireballs' color is PROOF that this is methane exploding, not jet fuel.) Later, after suriving the fall because a counter-vacuum (as clearly heard on 9/11 Eyewitness) pushed him up and slowed his rate of fall, he rolled into WTC7 and pushed it slightly off its foundation, causing it too to collapse.

That has about as much veracity as 99% of other claims I've seen here. That's my new theory as to what really happened, and no amount of scientific analysis, common sense, or factual evidence will change my mind. Anyone who disagrees is an agent of COINTELPRO, spreading disinfo in an attempt to prevent myself and other truth-seekers from identifying the government agent who was fed chili and instructed to cut ass on the 90th floor.

Evidence of massive methane (CH4) explosion, disproving second plane hit WTC:

WHO'S WITH ME!??!?!?!