Democratic Underground - Can anyone produce instances of "pseudoscience" in these reports on WTC7?

Can anyone produce instances of "pseudoscience" in these reports on WTC7? [View All]

MervinFerd

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-05-07 10:29 PM
Original message

Can anyone produce instances of "pseudoscience" in these reports on WTC7?

Advertisements [?]

It is alleged that these reports are "pseudoscience" and "fantasy". Can anyone actually produce (and defend rationally) any instances of fantasy or pseudoscience in these reports?

The NIST interim reports on WTC7:
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/WTC%20Part%20IIC%20-%20WTC%207%20Collapse%20Final.pdf
http://wtc.nist.gov/progress_report_june04/appendixl.pdf
The CounterPunch article
http://www.counterpunch.org/darkfire11282006.html

Hint: Asserting that the reports are "junk" or "nonsense" is not a rational defense of the proposition that they are "pseudoscience". For any credit at all you will need to find instances in which the reports are contrary to known facts or the expert opinion. or instances of faulty logic or mathematics.

Good Luck. You have 1 day per report.

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

Can anyone produce instances of "pseudoscience" in these reports on WTC7? [View All]