He was equating even-handedness with being wishy-washy because those pundits in Canada who prefer to be wishy-washy and "not take sides" - claim that they are "being even-handed".
He was ridiculing that characterization, IMO.
(Were you surprised to see a post title where I agreed with you?) B-)
P.S. I know you don't like principles and all that, but what do you think of the principles laid out in the article?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
