Reply #226: what's wrong with you? [View All]

[iverglas]

The poster said this:

So, you are saying that you would break the law to keep toting a handgun, even though it were deemed not to be a Constitutional right?

To which you replied:

It's not EVER going to be deemed "unconstitutional" to own a handgun

If you don't see the problem now, I don't know, maybe if you held it up to a mirror ...

I think it's been deemed not to be a constitutional right to possess child pornography.

I don't think it's ever been deemed "unconstitutional" to possess child pornography.

Do you really want me to explain why?

Because "unconstitutional" describes things that public bodies do.

So unless it were deemed "unconstitutional" for a public body to own a handgun ... well, you see where that's going, right?

How come you have to pretend that somebody said something they didn't say?

Was it that hard to just answer the question?

Apparently.