You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #41: Those hushed shows DIDN'T WORK [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
41. Those hushed shows DIDN'T WORK
Here's the deal. Everybody can agree that cute, cuddly looking animals like kangaroo, koala, and panda need to be saved because they're CUTE. We like them, and so place a certain intrinsic value in them. Like it or not, that's how the human mind works.

But how do you convince somebody of the intrinsic value of a 15 foot man eating crocodile? A lethally venomous snake? A predatory shark? How about a poisonous scorpion? Irwin recognized that these animals deserved the same respect and treatments as cuddly koala's, but that they weren't getting it because they were perceived as "monsters". A dead crocodile was seen as a good thing, and nobody questions the eradication of a Mamba den. Irwin realized that the ONLY way these animals would be protected was to get people to care about them. He wanted to show people that these animals were just animals, like any other, and that they deserved protection just like any other.

The problem was that the "hushed nature shows" are only watched by nature lovers, who were generally already on his side. He needed to appeal to a wider audience if he wanted to start changing minds. Were his methods always the best? Not at all, but it's indisputable that his methods got people to WATCH THE SHOW. Once they started watching, the battle was 90% over. He never showed fear of the animals, never injured them, and always focused on educating the viewers about the life and habits of the animal, its importance to the ecosystem, and how the image of the vicious beast was incorrect. He changed hearts and minds around the world, and most importantly he removed the fear and instilled respect for dangerous wildlife in an entire generation of children. Children who respect animals are FAR more likely to grow into adults who work on and support efforts to protect them. Irwin wasn't worried about the opinions of the 50 year old naturalists, he was more interested in maintaining the interest and opening the mind of the 5 year old nature lover. Irwin's shows caught the imagination, and opened the minds, of far more children than Wild Kingdom ever did.

Nobody can seriously doubt the value of that contribution. Irwin will be missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC