Reply #36: I do think so [View All]

[NMMNG]

Fundamentalist Christian Republican believes sex exists solely for procreation. And so fundy husband administers a quick, eight-to-ten thrust rogering of fundy wife once a month with a technique that's minimal on pleasure, but maximal on efficiency. For survey purposes, husband and wife are probably "satisfied" with the sex if it results in conception.

http://www.theagitator.com/archives/014976.php






For christian fundamentalists, sex is fundamentally evil. Procreation is the only valid excuse for having sex, so any sex that does not lead to procreation is evil. That is why religious "pro-lifers" not only oppose abortion, but also contraception and any kind of sex that does not lead to procreation. It is not about protecting life, and it has never been. It is only about forcing puritan anti-sex values on society.

http://www.webpan.com/dsinclair/rright1.html




By contrast, the Fundamentalist's idea of "traditional family values" is a father, a non-working mother, and children living for God and church, believing the Bible is infallible revealed truth, tolerating sex only for procreation, and pitying and punishing those poor damned souls who disagree with them.

http://www.edwinkagin.com/columns/traditional-family.htm




Furthermore, to many fundamentalists, any sexual conduct not for the purpose of procreation is "perverted." So fundamentalists not only reject artificial contraceptives, but often, natural family planning as well.

http://www.swans.com/library/art9/kblakr02.html




Booty calls - casual sex for kicks, no commitment - is sick, disgusting, immoral. Sex should only occur within the sanctity of a Christian marriage and then only for procreation. Life is not meant to be full of heedless pleasure, but hard work, piety and sacrifice. Sinners better look out, they are in for a warm time come judgement day.

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,19907712-5006007,00.html