Reply #59: no, I am not comfortable being a tattle tale on other DU'ers [View All]

[Malva Zebrina]

I would just ask that it is kept in mind--good for the goose and good for the gander. Because Laura is a Stepford, dumb and as insipid as doorknobs in a box fragile female and because she appears to need some sort of "coddling" or "protection" from criticism of her dowdy and dumpy appearance,over which she definately does have some control if she would just show some interest in looking better (like hiking up those droopy , waist length breasts into a foundation undergarment) but obviously does not care much about her personal appearance and so is as much as embarrassment as her husband. Laura is in the public domain. She raises funds for her insane husband's next campaign at fundraisers and Laura also makes policy speeches and is trotted out whenever a female image is thought needed--like when she rescued the Afganistan women from the Taliban, bragged about it, then abandoned them, and never went back. It does not matter what either of them have done- the point is the attack on their physical bodies which, it is said, they cannot help. What do I know--I am just learning the ropes after all this time, -and it seemed unequal ropes being used in this case and the attacks on the Laura thread were really hurtful--We are to protect and defend Laura for her propensity to make herself look dumpy, while it is OK to attack Coulter ruthlessly for her skinny body, because--well because she attacked us first!