Reply #65: I'm not in California. [View All]

[Frodo]

"We" in this case was "democrats". That part of the constitution of CA was put into place because of fear that corporations would buy elections for candidates against the overall will of the people (if they knew what was going on). So "we" put in a provision to remove Governors.

"When the facts came out is far less important (unimportant, actually) than the fact that they came out.
"

And that's kinda the point. Isn't it? The "facts" have NOT come out. At this point they are only allegations. He has certainly not admitted to "molesting" anyone. And see how you miss the "truth"? Even the original source says that A.S. never said he admired what hitler "did with it" but rather the exact opposite of that. If this was run a month ago (and the Times' source surely had it a month ago they could have hashed all of this out. I can only assume it comes out now because the leaker thinks it would be defeated if there was time.


As for McClintoch. Here's some "facts" for you:

1) Davis is done. Stick a fork in him. He's playing this up, but there is NOBODY saying "Gee I really wanted Ahhhnold, but since he's dirty I'll just vote 'no'". Davis picks up no "no" votes if Arnold dies a dirty death. How many Arnold supporters do you think there are who would otherwife want Davis to continue?

2) Cruz is dying a horrible political death. He's falling so fast the party has leaked that he might drop out to improve Davis' chances. There is speculation that he could come in third.

3) So who benefits? I just saw Fox interviewing McClintoch and speculating about what needs to occur for him to win. Maybe he just needs more DUers in CA helping to knock down his pro-choice pro-gun-control opponent? The neo-cons are all trying to get those people who were voting for arnold "because he was the only republican who can win" to switch over. Did you see the recent Alan Keyes endorsement?