You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: Spring, 1974 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Spring, 1974
As far as I know. (IANAL)

In 1974 the grand jury did not want the controversy of indicting a sitting POTUS. Possibly the independent prosecutor thought there would be a court case challenging the indictment. It was certainly Nixon's position that POTUS could not be indicted. So, in addition to indicting the six main WH conspirators (Haldemann, Erlichman, etc.) they handed down a sealed memo (is that what they called it?) naming Richard M. Nixon as an unindicted co-conspirator. Of course, the press got wind of this right away. (How? I cannot remember.) The feeding frenzy that resulted was something to behold. It caused a tremendous stir.

The House was already preparing to begin hearings on impeachment. The Senate hearings had completed the previous summer. The Saturday Night Massacre happened the previous October. By then, the country basically knew that Nixon was damaged goods. However, impeachment wasn't a sure thing until the smoking gun tape was revealed in August. That's the one where Nixon discusses having the CIA intervene in the FBI's investigation to stop it on the basis that it would reopen "the whole Bay of Pigs thing". As soon as people heard of this they knew that Nixon was toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC