You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #190: Could you please go into a little more depth? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #177
190. Could you please go into a little more depth?
Could you please explain to me how you easily dismiss speaking so gushingly of the same people we've been fighting for years in the Democratic Party. As I pointed out, never did one of rou Democratic candidates say such nice things- and the quotes I posted are more than nice things- they're praise and total admiration. The ones from the salon interview are from March 2003 while the Draft Clark sites were still trying to convince everyone what a Liberal and Bush-hater he was. How can you so easily dismiss that or expect people not to be alarmed?

Please provide come links to your assertion that he was recruited to join the Republican Party because my information is quite the reverse- that he wanted to run on the Republican ticket. And the other thing, if the man was such a die hard liberal that all the brass and Republicans hated him- why would they have tried to recruit him? That doesn't make much sense- not even for the Republicans. How many die-hard Liberals, hated by the Republicans, are invited, or even willing, to fund-raise for them? Please provide a few names and dates. You can't have it both ways- either Clark was such a Progressive which is why they hated him in the Military (because that keeps popping up as a defense in some threads) or they liked him enough to want to recruit him (an assertion, I have yet to see sourced properly).

2. Would you please provide a link to your refutal of the Wayne Madsen article? I would finally like to read a refutal that's a little more than "that's bunk".

3. Would you please provide a link to the article about the White House saying this is false and the information you're using to contradict this and Clark's own words of gushing praise at a pretty suspect time?

Thanks



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC