You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #28: It isn't only those in "third world" countries who are denied [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. It isn't only those in "third world" countries who are denied
Edited on Sun Dec-12-04 11:06 AM by ikojo
bathroom breaks. I recall a thread a year or so ago about checkers at grocery stores being denied the right to urinate on company time. Some posters said they knew of baggers and checkers who wore depends in order to make it through an eight hour day.

I also worked for an insurance company that had a contract to pay Medicare claims. They hired consultants to do productivity studies and those consultants told us that going to the bathroom twice a day was more than enough and any more than that cut into claims production.

A book was written a few years ago called, Void Where Prohibited all about OSHA's bathroom break rules...here is a blurb...

http://www.labornotes.org/bookshelf/vwpr.html

Void Where Prohibited Revisited
The Trickle-Down Effect of OSHA’S At-Will Bathroom Regulation

by Marc Linder

n Void Where Prohibited, Marc Linder exposed OSHA’s failure to protect worker’s rights to urinate on company time. Five years after OSHA declared that right in a memorandum, Linder examines OSHA’S record of enforcement in Void Where Prohibited Revisited.

Void Where Prohibited mobilized public opinion to pressure the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to issue its 1998 memorandum declaring that the industrial sanitation standard “requires employers to make toilet facilities available so that employees can use them when they need to do so.” (Previously, OSHA claimed that its requirement that employers provide toilets did not obligate them to let workers use those toilets.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC