You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: I found this earlier [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
ant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I found this earlier
http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/BushAndTheOddSync.wmv

My official position until now has been that this ear piece thing is silly bullshit. Now I have two questions that need answers:

1. What is the bulge in his back?
2. What is the voice in that press conference?

I believe it's possible there are non-earpiece related answers to these questions. The Bush people could easily explain what the hell is on his back. Someone with a technical background can explain the second.

However, I will note that during the press conference, the voice comes up BEFORE Bush speaks - which is odd for an echo - AND, it doesn't appear to match up exactly with what Bush says. At the end, the voice says, "this is a positive step forward for Iraq" while Bush says, "AND this is a positive step forward for Iraq." (I've read posts online from people who heard the whole thing who say this happened throughout - it was not a word for word parallel - but I don't know who those people are and can't judge the accuracy of their comments.)

It's possible I missed the "and" in the voice - the audio's not 100% - but in any case, we have two unexplainanble things here. An earpiece would be an explanation, but I'm not convinced it's the only explanation.

I will also point out that, if there was someone feeding him lines in that press conferece, Bush handled it quite smoothly. There are no awkward pauses and the rest like we saw during the debate. I don't know what that means, but it's an interesting inconsistency.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC