You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: This is not a flame ... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. This is not a flame ...
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 12:21 AM by RoyGBiv
It is some pointed criticism.

On the Daily Show, Jon Stewart regularly has a segment showing clips of talking heads, politicians, etc. repeating the same message, using the same words, over and over, implying rather clearly that this message has been handed to them by someone. It's a script with few alterations, and it's funny only because it is so absurd that those spouting this rhetoric don't seem to understand it is so transparent. But, when you think about it, it's not funny at all because most people don't understand it is just rhetoric, and even if they disagree with the message being offered, they find themselves using the same language, validating it, giving it power. They've accepted the message without realizing it.

Starting near the end of Cindy's vigil in Crawford, we started hearing a lot about how she was a potentially loose cannon. Most of this came from the right-wing noise machine, but little by little, people on our side of the fence starting using the same words. Within a few weeks, as it became apparent that Cindy is not in fact a brilliant politician with a cadre of advisers to write her speeches for her, she began making statements that some found objectionable. In response, people on the left, right, and in the middle began questioning her sanity, suggesting that a grieving mother was not necessarily the best leader for the anti-war movement because she was too emotionally involved and could not be trusted to choose her words wisely. Some went so far as to suggest she be abandoned as a spokesman, that she was doing more harm that good by offering "stupid" comments that reflected "badly" on "us."

That died down for awhile as we dealt with the aftermath of Katrina and focused on impending indictments of high-ranking administration officials, but the noise machine was still hard at work, looking for ways to redirect the focus. So, in the last several days, as Cindy has made her intentions not just to let this die, not just to give everyone a free pass merely because they belong to a certain political party, not just to bask in her fifteen minutes, we start hearing the noise again. It started with the right-wing machine, and it has found its way into our own discourse, by what path I shall not begin to opine.

Cindy has jumped the shark. What an insulting -- and repetitive -- thing to say. This isn't Happy Days. Cindy isn't The Fonz. No stunt-men will be involved and no script writers will be able to ensure a positive outcome. This is war, an illegal, immoral war based on lies that has taken the lives of thousands. I only wish I had the courage to lash myself to a fence, knowing full well I would be arrested, or worse, in order to ensure the focus remained where it should.

Half a century ago, another woman did an incredibly stupid thing. She jumped the shark and refused to give up her place on the bus, in Alabama of all places. What nerve. A group of people in Oklahoma, then Kansas, then other places all over the country figuratively chained themselves to lunch counters and refused to be moved. How dumb. These people were heroes, doing what they had to do to raise awareness, to force those in power to deal with their message.

If you don't like her tactics, come up with some of your own, enact them, and let us know where you'll be and when so we can support you. And when you jump the shark by doing something incredibly stupid, I'll be there with my repellent and tell everyone you were doing what had to be done.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC