You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No Flames >> What now in Iraq? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 02:58 PM
Original message
No Flames >> What now in Iraq?
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Wed Aug-13-03 02:59 PM by Skinner
ADMIN NOTE: From time to time, the administrators will be starting "No Flames" discussion topics such as this. There will be no flaming or incivility of any kind in this thread. There will be no discussion of any kind about other DU members. There will be no rude comments about progressive public figures, and no smears against supporters of any particular point of view. Even excessive use of profanity, capitalization, or exclamation points could get your post deleted. In other words: The normal DU rules do not apply in this thread. If you want to inflame, you can do so in another thread.




I was an opponent of the War in Iraq, as were many people on this message board.

The purpose of this thread is not to discuss whether or not war was appropriate. There is broad agreement here that it was not. The purpose of this thread is to discuss how the U.S. and the world community should deal with Iraq now that the country has already been invaded, Saddam Hussein is out of power, and there is an occupying force on the ground in that country.

Given the current situation in that country I believe that it would be wrong for us to simply leave Iraq. This is not an endorsement of the war. But it is an acknowledgement that our government's policies have left us with no good options.

If we were to leave Iraq now, we would plunge that country into even greater chaos than exists right now. We would virtually guarantee that the next government of Iraq would be yet another dictatorial regime -- either secular or theocratic -- which would be a disaster for the Iraqi people.

Instead, I believe that we should do the following:

1. We should internationalize the occupation force to give the U.N. and other Arab nations a significant role. We should even consider placing the entire occupation under the control of the U.N.

2. This international force should remain in Iraq until a relatively stable, democratically elected government is in place in Iraq. This democratically elected government must be based on the rule of law, and it must guarantee basic human rights to the citizens of Iraq.

3. Once Iraq has a stable, democratic government, the international force should leave.

What do you think? What now in Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC