You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: Bernard Weiner replies [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
Bernard Weiner Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Bernard Weiner replies
I don't want folks to get hung up on this minor matter, since that's not the major thrust of my essay. But I quoted Clinton as saying he had not had "sexual relations" with Lewinsky; he could have used the term "sexual intercourse," but he didn't. Was he trying to be "delicate" in the matter, or was he further obfuscating? I think most Americans would say that fellatio qualifies as "sexual relations," but does not qualify as "sexual intercourse." Anyway, on to the main point of the essay, which is about Bush lies and his crude attempts to redefine himself out of war-crimes charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC