You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Idaho wilderness is about to be given away to develpers for free [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:44 AM
Original message
Idaho wilderness is about to be given away to develpers for free
Advertisements [?]
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-king14aug14,0,552990.story?coll=la-opinion-rightrail

Idaho's Off-Road Uproar
A bill promises to preserve the wilderness -- for gearheads.
By Carole King, CAROLE KING is a singer, songwriter and longtime conservation activist.
August 14, 2006

WHILE OUR attention is on other parts of the world, an insidious movement is underway at home to privatize nationally owned land. Its proponents are using federal "quid pro quo" bills, which typically include just enough wilderness designation to get a buy-in from selected conservation groups. Roughly 250,000 acres have been privatized through such legislation since 2000.

One such bill is the proposed Central Idaho Economic Development and Recreation Act, which has passed in the House and is pending in the Senate.


Why is a bill for Idaho of interest to Los Angeles residents or anyone else outside of Idaho? Because public lands in Idaho are owned by all Americans, including my mother in Florida, your father in Highland Park and the president's housekeeper in Texas.

This bill asks Americans to accept the outright giveaway of thousands of acres of public land in Idaho for private development. In return for their support, the handful of conservation groups backing it may claim its passage as a "win" because some land is designated as wilderness.

But this bill does not protect federal water rights, thus threatening salmon recovery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC