Reply #28: Which brings to question - why did Obama veto HR3808? [View All]

[DemReadingDU]

Was it because the original documents were destroyed and had to be forged, thus putting the foreclosures on-hold until the paperwork is corrected?

or does this give the banks more time to hide the losses so they are able to report good earnings?

Does anyone really think Obama did not ask his advisers whether the bill should be vetoed?

There is something nagging me that somehow the veto would benefit the bankers, somehow.