did his constituents know he would allow a religious belief that is in no way part of our government to give him permission to vote to treat women as second-class citizens?
because the truth is that the democratic party platform states it is pro-choice - REAL LIVES - not some religious ideation not grounded in science or law.
imo, anyone who is not pro-choice who cannot support choice anyway has no business in the democratic party.
anti-choice is a RADICALLY RIGHT POSITION.
it is an anti-equal rights position.
he may not force his religious beliefs on others in this nation. but, since he takes this position, I hope he is primaried.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
