You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: Repubs defeated reform when unemployment was low in 2007. "The nations unemployment rate was 4.5% [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. 
when legislation sponsored by Sens. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) in 2007 stalemated in the Senate." Republicans defeated reform then. They adjust their stated reasons (in 2007 it was "amnesty" which will be part of their spiel again in 2010, I"m sure), so now they are concerned about "job security". The one constant is their opposition to reform.

"General anxiety over job security likely will continue to drive Republican opposition against House and Senate immigration bills."

"Smith and King (both republicans, of course) argue Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano was wrong in suggesting last week that the recession has triggered a significant decline in immigration (even though that is a fact) and the best opportunity to enact reform.

How can they allow 12 million illegal immigrants to take jobs that should go to citizens and legal immigrants?, he asked in a statement announcing the forum. And how can they claim that enforcement is done when there are more than 400 open miles of border with Mexico (gotta finish the Great Wall of the Rio Grande), hundreds of thousands of criminal and fugitive aliens (are you scared yet? - republicans make sure we are scared and then pass their legislation, sounds familiar) and millions of illegal immigrants (us vs. them - damn foreigners!) taking American jobs?

What I never see the republicans address is the question of which word from "illegal immigrant" scares them more. If it is "illegal", then they should either support reform to allow the "illegal" to become "legal" (and less exploitable by unscrupulous employers - which is why unions support reform) or the reform of immigration laws to make immigrating legally realistic rather than so impossible that sneaking across a desert and hiding for years is preferable.

I suspect that it is the "immigrant" word that scares repubs more, but they are smart enough to realize that basing their opposition on the "illegal" part is more acceptable and still accomplishes the same goal of getting rid of "them" and keeping them out. And that is why they support neither reform for those who are already here nor of the entire immigration system. But then the "law and order" party of decades gone by knows that "just enforcing the law" can blunt efforts for change, reinforce the status of the powers that be, and keep others in their place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC