You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: There will likely not be a ban. It is needed. But smart use will help. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. There will likely not be a ban. It is needed. But smart use will help.
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 01:57 PM by Gman2
They didnt provide evacuation equipement. To contain molten and burning plastics. Simple workaround. Nope. They have known these things for years. Bush helped to make a five year window that a chem need not be vetted for harm. Five years, for a chem to proliferate, in the marketplace, before they have to tell you it causes cancer, after five year exposure. It is insane. Meds, are allowed to make up their own tests. And design their own efficacy studies. It's all about the benjamins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC