There are small parties but they have to be aproved by corporate money so they have no change to win elections, for more than 200 hundred years there have been only two parties in charge of government and I guess that those two parties are the ones who supervise the elections. Now to challenge those parties someone has to be able to spend 20 millions or more from their own packet like Ross Perot, it would be imposible for a citizen without money to be president then the media is in bed with those parties, having dedicated talk shows to spread their ideology.
God there are too many similarities between those two democracies.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
