what that means is that they can be punished for lying, instead of the way they usually get away with it. The Bush administration assiduously avoids being under oath for just that reason. Remember in reecent hearings when the Repubs wouldn't let Gonzales testify under oath--thats why. Instead, Gonzo got to say anything he wanted without consequences. Remembr the way the Repubs wouldn't let their oilcompany CEO buddies be put under oath? Same thing--they get to say anything the want wihtout consequesnces Thats what you get in a Republican "accountability" administration. Put the bastids under oath so we can get them fr perjury the same as they did Clinton
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(598 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
