You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: What an awful idea. Orwellian and too many ways for it to backfire. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
darkism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. What an awful idea. Orwellian and too many ways for it to backfire.
Edited on Tue Jun-27-06 01:47 PM by darkism
First, what's to prevent someone from sending someone they didn't like a bunch of child porn anonymously via proxy, thus tripping the checks and getting that person investigated?

Second, two words: Hash collision. What if a perfectly innocuous file shares the same hash with a child porn file?

Everybody wants to stop child exploitation, but this is not the way to go about it. Unfortunately there will be no public outcry because anyone who is unnerved about this will be painted as a pedophile or pedophile sympathizer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC