Reply #108: ooh, where'd you get that quote? is that in the docket? [View All]

[NuttyFluffers]

i'd actually like to see that.

if it is something as silly as simple castigation and criticism, then yes, one would be fully able to express that here. from the article (and not being able to find any real links on the article to the docket or formal complaint) it really could have been anything. one can challenge scholastic research in peer review, or make unsubstantiated claims of nonsense to the contrary as a layman, but there is distinct potential to cross the line and that's why there's these rules for unprotected speech in america.

if it as cut and dry as what additional resource you've found then, yes, you are right, i wouldn't find this as grounds for defamation as ruled in america. but i'd still like to see where you found that new info, looks amusing.