You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #36: the amount of vaccines children were scheduled to receive increased in the [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #24
36. the amount of vaccines children were scheduled to receive increased in the
early 90s. Kids at very young ages were then required to get three, four, and even five vaccines at a time. When I was a child, kids were not required to have that amount of vaccines, so I think the sheer number of vaccines is the difference rather than the fact that they always contained thimerasol.

My son had a very bad reaction to his 15 month vaccines, he went limp and ran a high fever for days, and then stopped talking (he had been talking like crazy before those shots). He completely changed, in 48 hours. He also developed a severe vision problem after the vaccines. He is thankfully almost completely recovered now, due to aggressive early intervention and just plain luck. Others have not been so lucky.

I do not advocate not vaccinating children, I think vaccines are necessary. I just requested non-thimerasol vaccines afterwards for my kids and have never had a problem since. I'm glad that they've finally taken the thimerasol out of the vaccines.

I will never believe that there wasn't a connection in my son's case. I believe what I saw with my own eyes in this instance. I think that some kids are just more sensitive to mercury in their systems and have more difficulty eliminating the substance, this sensitivity triggers neurological problems in that subset of kids. Just my opinion. There is absolutely no autism spectrum disorder in either my husband's family or my own, and I'm going back generations so in our case I don't think there is a hereditary link.

BTW, the NYTimes seems to be really invested somehow in debunking the possibility of the thimerasol link. They ran two articles a few weeks ago too, that each contradicted each other. What's up with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC