Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Post endorses Ben Cardin over Mfume.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Maryland Donate to DU
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 05:28 PM
Original message
Washington Post endorses Ben Cardin over Mfume.
Edited on Mon Aug-21-06 05:28 PM by nickshepDEM
Once the boy wonder of Maryland politics, Mr. Cardin has 40 years of legislative experience to his credit, including a stint as one of the youngest-ever and best speakers of the state House of Delegates. In Congress he has forged strategic alliances with key Republicans, thereby breaking from the pack of Democrats who have struggled in an era of GOP dominance to make a mark; he has thus been able to craft important bills to enhance the financial security of retirees and streamline the Internal Revenue Service.

On those measures, his partnership with former representative Rob Portman, an Ohio Republican who is now the White House budget chief, is a textbook lesson in how a minority-party lawmaker can wield influence.

The rap on Mr. Cardin is that he is a legislator's legislator -- a quiet, colorless insider who embodies the system but is ill-equipped to shake it up. In fact, a hallmark of Mr. Cardin's legislative record is tough-minded independence. He was one of a minority of Democrats to vote against the war in Iraq, though once troops were on the ground he acted responsibly by supporting bills to fund and equip them. He broke with many Democrats and labor unions to back the North American Free Trade Agreement. At the same time he has stood against the Bush administration's fiscal recklessness, opposing estate tax cuts for the rich.

Mr. Cardin is a recognized expert on health care, tax and trade policy, and his tough-minded, sensible record has made him one of the House's most respected members on both sides of the aisle.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/20/AR2006082000512.html
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Alex35332 Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. When can we stop calling the post liberal?
I mean, they seem to be "Neo-Con Democrat" to me,ie: imperialistic, capitalistic, ethnocentric, but pro-choice. BTW that is a term that is getting out there more and more as the mainstream media is realizing that Neo-Cons have infiltrated both parties. I have seen it around the blogosphere in "the peoples voices" I think I even saw it in the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sasha Undercover Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You should have
stopped calling them liberal about 10 minutes after Katherine Graham died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. No, when Donald Graham took over. I'm voting Cardin. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. No. When Katharine Graham gave that speech
saying that the press shouldn't do Woodstein-type reporting anymore now that Watergate was over.

Other than those four years, the Post was NEVER liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bertha katzenengel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Aahhh, shit.
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Post editorial page is more conservative than the rest of the paper
They supported the Iraq invasion, after all. The paper itself is much more liberal. The same is true of the Wall Street Journal, though the difference is more pronounced there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 24th 2024, 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Maryland Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC