(both are press releases)
Reverend Al Sharpton Clarifies His Position On Justice Janice Rogers Brown
(08 November 2003 08:58) Written by Herb Boyd
NEW YORK, NY—Democratic Presidential Candidate, the Reverend Al Sharpton, issued the following statement to clarify his position on the potential filibuster of President Bush’s nomination of California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers Brown to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
“I am strongly opposed to the nomination of Janice Rogers Brown to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.” “She is so far removed from the judicial mainstream that she poses a serious threat to the progress we have made in civil rights.” “This morning, I made phone calls to Senator Lahey, through his Chief-of-Staff, Luke Albee, and Senators John Edwards, and Charles Schumer, to convey my opposition to the nomination of Justice Brown.” “I asked the Senators to do everything within their means to prevent her from gaining a lifetime appointment to this important Court, and call upon the full Senate to take the same steps to ensure that she is not confirmed.”
http://www.tbwt.org/home/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=21&Itemid=1
Black Group Critical of Sharpton's Civil Rights Flip-Flop
11/7/03 2:20:00 PM
To: National Desk
Contact: David Almasi, 202-371-1400, ext. 106, for Project 21
WASHINGTON, Nov. 7 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Reverend Al Sharpton's dramatic 24-hour reversal on federal judicial nominee Janice Rogers Brown is strongly criticized by members of the African-American leadership network Project 21.
Forty-eight hours ago, Sharpton agreed with Project 21 that Brown deserves fair treatment, including a vote. Yesterday, apparently under political pressure, Sharpton changed his mind.
Members of Project 21 question Sharpton's commitment civil rights in now seeking to deny the black judge a fair and timely confirmation process, especially as Sharpton's new position violates not only the U.S. Constitution but Sharpton's own views.
In a Nov. 5 interview with Sinclair Broadcasting, Sharpton opposed plans by liberal senators to keep the Brown nomination from coming to a full vote in the U.S. Senate through a filibuster. He said: "I don't agree with her politics. I don't agree with some of her background. But she should get an up-or-down vote." The next day, however, Sharpton's office released a statement urging senators "to do everything within their means to prevent" Brown from being confirmed. Speaking on liberal pressure experienced by Sharpton to change his opinion, talk radio host Armstrong Williams, who was in contact with Sharpton, told The Washington Times: "He said they were putting a lot of pressure on him."
-snip-
Project 21 has been a leading voice in the African-American community since 1992. For more information and to schedule an interview, contact David Almasi at 202-371-1400, ext. 106 or Project21@nationalcenter.org, or visit Project 21's Web site at
http://www.project21.org/P21Index.html.http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=120-11072003(NOTE: I know NOTHING about Project 21 and am not supporting their views. I just provided the two pieces to back up the fact that Sharpton changed his opinion on the matter twice within the same week.)
EDITED BY ADMIN FOR COPYRIGHT REASONS