Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Cha

(297,725 posts)
12. The "centrists" who WON the BLUE WAVE House Victory in 2018!
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 03:23 AM
Jan 2020

Those Dems who Flipped Over 40 red seats to BLUE.. that's who



BS didn't even see the Blue Wave coming..

Bernie Sanders casts doubt on blue wave

https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/412535-sanders-casts-doubt-on-blue-wave

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Thank you, sir!! Tiggeroshii Jan 2020 #1
Good point RandySF Jan 2020 #2
Centrists? The Valley Below Jan 2020 #3
And McGovern met your standard by any measwure . . . markpkessinger Jan 2020 #7
We had a populist running "as a Democrat" in 1972. The Valley Below Jan 2020 #9
If Bernie is a "populist," then so was FDR markpkessinger Jan 2020 #14
Centrist has become an epithet, apparently. And you seem to define it a any Democrat not ehrnst Jan 2020 #29
FDR was a certified member of the privileged power elite. Hortensis Jan 2020 #53
You fail to examine the specific comparisons made LanternWaste Jan 2020 #32
You're right. The country is different now calguy Jan 2020 #52
Centrist Go Vols Jan 2020 #36
And long since, the Democratic Party is PROVEN to have returned Hortensis Jan 2020 #54
ok... how many Bernie backed candidates in contested areas lapfog_1 Jan 2020 #4
I'll do Democratic Congressional & Senatorial Campaign Committees as a benchmark. Scurrilous Jan 2020 #6
Do you mean 2018 when we had the BLUE WAVE House Cha Jan 2020 #11
yes, typo - 2018 lapfog_1 Jan 2020 #18
Any analysis of 2016 that ignores Russia is naive at best. delisen Jan 2020 #5
any analysis of 2020 that ignores russia is the same. mopinko Jan 2020 #35
LOL @ 'anti-establishment fervor was running at a high' after 8 years of Obama. Scurrilous Jan 2020 #8
I wonder if some people were alive in 1972? The Valley Below Jan 2020 #10
"Hey, hey, ACA! How many kids did you kill today?" Scurrilous Jan 2020 #17
The "centrists" who WON the BLUE WAVE House Victory in 2018! Cha Jan 2020 #12
Yep! BS did think that he would be the one having the most influence in the 2018 blue wave. ehrnst Jan 2020 #25
Yes, it was Nancy Pelosi advising to campaign on ACA who help immensely Cha Jan 2020 #38
Speaker Pelosi will be treated better by history than she is now. See also: ehrnst Jan 2020 #49
I don't think it'll be like 1972... Drunken Irishman Jan 2020 #13
I grew up in Pennsylvania . . . markpkessinger Jan 2020 #15
Again, it's the margins. Drunken Irishman Jan 2020 #16
Following the logic of your own post . . . markpkessinger Jan 2020 #45
Moderates didn't go for Hillary by near the margin they did Obama... Drunken Irishman Jan 2020 #60
A self described Socialist.. and not a uniter like Joe Biden.. Cha Jan 2020 #19
It remains to be seen whether Biden will be any more of uniter than anyone else n/t markpkessinger Jan 2020 #44
I keep reading fantasies about a brokered convention tirebiter Jan 2020 #20
Maybe you have a point on 1972 Hav Jan 2020 #21
Post removed Post removed Jan 2020 #28
No artument with . . . markpkessinger Jan 2020 #42
'Those" Actual Democrats... you write that as though you're not one. ehrnst Jan 2020 #58
No argument with the systemic problems of the electoral college . .. markpkessinger Jan 2020 #43
Yes, she got more votes than anyone not named Obama... ehrnst Jan 2020 #50
The raw number of votes was a result of turnout and a larger electorate markpkessinger Jan 2020 #56
You skipped this part... she got that "raw" number despite... ehrnst Jan 2020 #57
What other candidate was up against Russia, the FBI director and misogyny... ehrnst Jan 2020 #59
If it's status quo repairman vs gonna fuck shit up Voltaire2 Jan 2020 #22
"Win again?" Who is the "gonna fuck shit up" in your metaphor? ehrnst Jan 2020 #24
Who thinks this? ehrnst Jan 2020 #23
Have you read some of the responses to this thread?; n/t markpkessinger Jan 2020 #39
Are you saying that the OP predicted that in advance of posting.... ehrnst Jan 2020 #48
Yes, including one of yours that's gone missing. Hillary's approval Hortensis Jan 2020 #55
Amen. Nanjeanne Jan 2020 #26
1972 was prosperity & propaganda "better dead than red" Prosper Jan 2020 #27
How about Britain 2019 then? dsc Jan 2020 #30
I am not convinced British politics are necessarily a good barometer of U.S. politics n/t markpkessinger Jan 2020 #40
we didn't hear that. Voltaire2 Jan 2020 #41
It is beyond strange that people think 2016 is a better predictor of 2020 than 2018 brooklynite Jan 2020 #31
A midterm is a different animal from a presidential election n/t markpkessinger Jan 2020 #47
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2020 #33
The 2020 election will be won or lost in the suburbs. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2020 #34
Marshall Matz, who was a policy adviser for Sen. George McGovern's failed 1972 bid is worried Gothmog Jan 2020 #37
2016 The Revolution Jan 2020 #46
but not quite as strange as people believing that the 1930s are a better predictor Fresh_Start Jan 2020 #51
Spot on. BlueWI Jan 2020 #61
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2020 #62
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»It is beyond strange that...»Reply #12