Democratic Primaries

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)

31. Yes, it does require far less effort keeping up with new data...very different from "focus."

Reply to pnwmom (Reply #28)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 09:38 AM

Jan 2020

Last edited Mon Jan 20, 2020, 10:22 AM - Edit history (1)

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Times' endorsement criticizes Sanders & Biden for age, but not 70somethings Warren & Bloomberg [View all] highplainsdem Jan 2020 OP

It's realistic. At their age, 7-8 years makes a big difference, and she is in great shape. pnwmom Jan 2020 #1

Biden's in great shape for his age. And as I've pointed out here before, women Warren's age highplainsdem Jan 2020 #3

Her agile, analytical, quick-wittedness is demonstrated every day. pnwmom Jan 2020 #8

Biden is clearly showing signs of cognitive decline since leaving office Fiendish Thingy Jan 2020 #33

No, he isn't. But keep making desperate arguments. highplainsdem Jan 2020 #34

I never heard THAT one before! Where did you get that? CTyankee Jan 2020 #36

Since my mother developed Alzheimer's, and I'm a woman, I've read a lot about this. highplainsdem Jan 2020 #39

Now, that's a good assessment. I'm sure her team has a similar answer to that question when CTyankee Jan 2020 #40

I've read (quickly) the opinion and think there are a lot of good points in it. spooky3 Jan 2020 #2

Bloomberg wasn't interviewed. So he wasn't an actor in this ridiculous, 'Political Survivor" episode wiley Jan 2020 #9

You're talking about the show, which I didn't see. I am spooky3 Jan 2020 #16

+++ still_one Jan 2020 #19

actually a 70 year old women dsc Jan 2020 #4

Like I've said before, Mandela was 77 when he became president of S. Africa. sinkingfeeling Jan 2020 #5

+1,000,000 highplainsdem Jan 2020 #6

He was one-of-a-kind. None of our candidates are comparable including the oldest two. n/t pnwmom Jan 2020 #10

Maybe Liz is one of a kind too. I, for one, consider her to be so. CTyankee Jan 2020 #37

Makes good sense to me. delisen Jan 2020 #7

I know it's unrealistic, grumpyduck Jan 2020 #11

Np one cares evertonfc Jan 2020 #12

KR NYMinute Jan 2020 #13

Go Joe! Scurrilous Jan 2020 #14

That is Awesome! It's so cool how Biden just zeros in on Cha Jan 2020 #21

... Scurrilous Jan 2020 #23

... Cha Jan 2020 #25

Should have squirecam Jan 2020 #15

Elizabeth looks fantastic for her age..Bernie/Biden not so much..nt helpisontheway Jan 2020 #17

Biden also looks fantastic for his age. highplainsdem Jan 2020 #20

I don't think that's true.. Biden looks Great Cha Jan 2020 #22

biden looks younger than 77 and bernie is as sharp as ever. jg10003 Jan 2020 #24

No, he looks his age. And Bernie sticks to the same script as ever, pnwmom Jan 2020 #28

I call it focused jg10003 Jan 2020 #29

Yes, it does require far less effort keeping up with new data...very different from "focus." ehrnst Jan 2020 #31

NYT: enabling lies and wars since 2001. Hassler Jan 2020 #18

Hah. So that's why they endorsed Warren and Klobuchar! pnwmom Jan 2020 #27

Yeah, those pulitzer prizes are so overrated.... ehrnst Jan 2020 #32

Where do you get your news? (Honest curiosity.) nt LAS14 Jan 2020 #42

NYT nails sander perfectly Gothmog Jan 2020 #26

These NYT comments on Warren are brutal Gothmog Jan 2020 #30

I've had this weird feeling all morning that the NYT invaded my brain. LAS14 Jan 2020 #35

Oh, me too LAS14! I'm old and I want so much to see a woman president of this country! CTyankee Jan 2020 #38

NYT is why the "Iraq has WMD's and Uranium One stories had legs booley Jan 2020 #41