Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Gothmog

(145,968 posts)
43. Choices for Financing Medicare for All: A Preliminary Analysis
Tue Oct 29, 2019, 03:12 PM
Oct 2019

This is from a non-partisan think group that is well respected http://www.crfb.org/papers/choices-financing-medicare-all-preliminary-analysis

Proposals to adopt single-payer health care in the United States have grown in popularity in recent years, as numerous lawmakers and presidential candidates have embraced Medicare for All. However, few have grappled with how to finance the new costs imposed on the federal government. By most estimates, Medicare for All would cost the federal government about $30 trillion over the next decade. How this cost is financed would have considerable distributional, economic, and policy implications.

In the coming months, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget will publish a detailed analysis describing numerous ways to finance Medicare for All and the consequences and trade-offs associated with each choice. This paper provides our preliminary estimates of the magnitude of each potential change and a brief discussion of the types of trade-offs policymakers will need to consider.

We find that Medicare for All could be financed with:

A 32 percent payroll tax
A 25 percent income surtax
A 42 percent value-added tax (VAT)
A mandatory public premium averaging $7,500 per capita – the equivalent of $12,000 per individual not otherwise on public insurance
More than doubling all individual and corporate income tax rates
An 80 percent reduction in non-health federal spending
A 108 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) increase in the national debt
Impossibly high taxes on high earners, corporations, and the financial sector
A combination of approaches

Each of these choices would have consequences for the distribution of income, growth in the economy, and ability to raise new revenue. Some of these consequences could be balanced against each other by adopting a combination approach that includes smaller versions of several of the options as well as additional policies.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Expanding the already-existing Medicare isn't reinventing the wheel. area51 Sep 2019 #1
Considerable difference between MFA and a Public Option. PNHP represents 2% of physicians. Hoyt Sep 2019 #2
Always thought the public option was an excellent idea. "Try before you buy." n/t Beartracks Sep 2019 #6
You can't expand the existing medicare system for all...it will be a new system and damned expensive Demsrule86 Sep 2019 #13
You wouldn't want Medicare expanded. It's very inadequate. Hortensis Oct 2019 #19
My Medicare coverage is great Bradshaw3 Oct 2019 #29
That "supplemental" you have to purchase out of pocket Hortensis Oct 2019 #32
What we have now is a scam Bradshaw3 Oct 2019 #33
It wouldn't be expanded, it'd completely new with old name on it. Hortensis Oct 2019 #35
Wrong. The system is in place Bradshaw3 Oct 2019 #36
MfA would be profit-based medicine, B3. I suspect Sanders Hortensis Oct 2019 #38
ZIIIINNG!!! Pelosi is doing great on impeachment, but she has this one wrong!! InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2019 #28
Thank you, Nancy Pelosi! Cha Sep 2019 #3
There's so much that's wrong about this Maven Sep 2019 #4
Relative to PO I don't see how MFA is a good idea, MFA would be starting over completely uponit7771 Sep 2019 #9
+1 Joe941 Oct 2019 #24
just do SOMETHING dweller Sep 2019 #5
Nobody willingly gives up the football Nasruddin Sep 2019 #7
K&R betsuni Sep 2019 #8
KICK! Cha Sep 2019 #10
Post removed Post removed Sep 2019 #11
Speaker Pelosi -- always rational and astute. nt BlueMississippi Sep 2019 #12
Pelosi Wants Focus on Obamacare Gothmog Sep 2019 #14
Nancy backs Joe's position Gothmog Sep 2019 #15
NBC/WSJ poll shows Biden's healthcare stance (optional Medicare buy-in) much more popular Gothmog Sep 2019 #16
Obamacare Has Made People Healthier Gothmog Oct 2019 #17
Speaker is absolutely right. It took a tremendous effort to get to Obamacare. We should do as she & onetexan Oct 2019 #22
:) Pelosi's biased. She is, above all the others involved, THE person Hortensis Oct 2019 #18
KICK! Cha Oct 2019 #20
Oh Nancy. We can do better and provide coverage and healthcare to more people. aikoaiko Oct 2019 #21
Billionaire health execs agree. Voltaire2 Oct 2019 #23
K&R Tarheel_Dem Oct 2019 #25
I'm with Nancy on this. calguy Oct 2019 #26
You are so right, Nancy. It's what the people want. emmaverybo Oct 2019 #27
"Improving" the ACA would improve the insurers bottom line Bradshaw3 Oct 2019 #30
Why Elizabeth Warren won't talk about the cost of 'Medicare for All' Gothmog Oct 2019 #42
Mahalo, Goth! Cha Nov 2019 #50
Joe and Pelosi for the win. oasis Oct 2019 #31
30% of US Health Care Expenditures Are Administrative DrFunkenstein Oct 2019 #34
Incrementalism again. We've done 40 years of it. Enough! Doremus Oct 2019 #37
Yeah, and President Obama finally got somewhere.. Cha Oct 2019 #46
One success in 40 years isn't a record I'm proud of. Are you? Doremus Nov 2019 #48
We're very proud of ACA.. the foundation Cha Nov 2019 #49
73% of people favor [the] public option that would keep private insurance in place Gothmog Oct 2019 #39
K&R Scurrilous Oct 2019 #40
Support for a public option has been increasing, and for Medicare-for-All has been decreasing Gothmog Oct 2019 #41
Choices for Financing Medicare for All: A Preliminary Analysis Gothmog Oct 2019 #43
A good rule of thumb: Don't get to Pelosi's left Gothmog Oct 2019 #44
Nancy knows how to WIN.. she handled it Well.. Cha Oct 2019 #45
Joe Biden's health care plan will be ready to go the day he's sworn into office Gothmog Oct 2019 #47
She is right. And you are selling her short if you think it's political. Chemisse Nov 2019 #51
yeah. no. *health care* will still be beholden to the all mighty dollar. that is not sustainable. Kurt V. Nov 2019 #52
Pelosi: 'I'm not a big fan of Medicare for All' Gothmog Nov 2019 #53
From Harry Reid Gothmog Nov 2019 #54
Bullshit. Act_of_Reparation Nov 2019 #55
A good rule of thumb: Don't get to Pelosi's left Gothmog Nov 2019 #56
I assume there is some sort of point you're trying to make with this. Act_of_Reparation Nov 2019 #57
According to this poll, MFA is a bad idea Gothmog Nov 2019 #58
Yes. Just finish and build on Obamacare as always planned. Hortensis Nov 2019 #59
When it comes to Medicare-for-all, listen to Nancy Pelosi Gothmog Nov 2019 #60
Nancy Pelosi is "not for doing away with Obamacare" and prefers to give people choices. Gothmog Dec 2019 #61
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Speaker Pelosi-There's no...»Reply #43