Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Gothmog

(145,631 posts)
44. Prof. Tribe thinks that these laws are constitutional
Wed Mar 6, 2019, 01:21 PM
Mar 2019

Prof. Tribe disagrees with your analysis https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/14/opinions/state-laws-requiring-tax-return-disclosure-legal-tribe-painter-eisen/index.html

Our federal Constitution allows states to create ballot access requirements that ensure that the ballots for every office, including the office of presidential elector, are comprehensible and informative.

A line must of course be drawn between permissible ballot access laws and impermissible attempts to add qualifications to those specified in the federal Constitution. But our research and analysis lead us to conclude that tax return disclosure laws such as the one proposed in California resemble ballot access laws in structure, impact, and purpose much more closely than they resemble laws imposing additional qualifications for presidential office.

As a result, we believe these laws comport fully with the U.S. Constitution.

Unlike prohibited qualifications, these laws do not impose substantive requirements on candidates beyond those imposed by the Constitution itself; that is, these laws do not limit which candidates may run for office based on any particular information in their tax return. Thus, they do not create an insurmountable barrier in advance to any set of individuals otherwise qualified under Article II of our Constitution. Instead, these laws require federally qualified candidates to comply with a relatively minor process of tax disclosure. That is something competing candidates can and should readily do in order to allow voters to make more informed judgments about those contenders' characters or backgrounds.

I trust Prof. Tribe on this.

As a practical matter, trump may not be challenging these laws because if the Democrats retake the House, they will be getting his ta returns as one of the first items of business. House Democrats have done three or four votes to put GOP members on record as not wanting to get trump's tax returns and this may still be an issue in the midterms. This could mean that sanders would be the only candidate suing to invalidate these laws. That will not be a great position to take with Democratic voters
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Christie had vetoed a similar law when he was governor Gothmog Feb 2019 #1
the governor in NJ is a Democrat now NewJeffCT Feb 2019 #2
I agree Gothmog Feb 2019 #5
I'm sure it will get challenged in court. Being that the Constitution leaves elections SFnomad Feb 2019 #3
Prof. Tribe thinks that these laws are constitutional Gothmog Mar 2019 #44
Did you just cut/past this from somewhere else? SFnomad Mar 2019 #45
Every Presidential Canidate should follow Elizabeth Cha Feb 2019 #4
What's The Deal With Refusung To Show Tax Returns Me. Feb 2019 #6
There were stories that Trump was shocked NewJeffCT Feb 2019 #7
He's Shocked, I'm Shocked Me. Feb 2019 #11
Transparency, baby! That's what it's Cha Feb 2019 #10
I know she isn't well liked here. WeekiWater Feb 2019 #33
Fantastic! NurseJackie Feb 2019 #8
It's a start. pressbox69 Feb 2019 #9
Oh - it will pass alright JustAnotherGen Feb 2019 #12
I'd also like politicians to be required to release... VarryOn Feb 2019 #13
And child support payments? CrossingTheRubicon Feb 2019 #15
Sure. Very relavent... VarryOn Feb 2019 #16
I agree. Full disclosure. CrossingTheRubicon Feb 2019 #17
That's the way it should be Andy823 Feb 2019 #14
Not to throw cold water - but TomSlick Feb 2019 #18
I think at the state level NewJeffCT Feb 2019 #19
A reasonable argument. TomSlick Feb 2019 #21
Every state has rules about who gets on the ballot. rgbecker Feb 2019 #35
Again, a reasonable argument. TomSlick Feb 2019 #36
Well if there is going to be a tax return rule it has to start sometime. rgbecker Feb 2019 #39
I don't disagree. TomSlick Feb 2019 #42
We are changing our reputation JustAnotherGen Feb 2019 #22
Those are the *minimum* requirements. I don't see any reason why Congress or states The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2019 #27
Candidates who won't disclose taxes shouldn't be on the ballot Gothmog Feb 2019 #28
Great! Transparency for everyone. No double standards. nt R B Garr Feb 2019 #20
Released their tax returns every year since 1977, Gothmog Feb 2019 #23
Yep, if you dont release them you are hiding something PERIOD Eliot Rosewater Feb 2019 #26
WTG New Jersey!! Peacetrain Feb 2019 #24
California Needs to do this! UCmeNdc Feb 2019 #25
Yeah for Senator Warren Gothmog Feb 2019 #29
Politics How States Could Force Trump to Release His Tax Returns Gothmog Feb 2019 #30
Yes!!! honest.abe Feb 2019 #31
At this point in time, a law shouldn't have to be passed. WeekiWater Feb 2019 #32
Has sanders released his tax returns yet? Gothmog Feb 2019 #34
Not yet. rgbecker Feb 2019 #40
It's really odd how someone can imply there's R B Garr Feb 2019 #41
Good leftofcool Feb 2019 #37
... Scurrilous Feb 2019 #38
Senator Gillibrand has released her taxes Gothmog Mar 2019 #43
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»NJ to pass law requiring ...»Reply #44