Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
30. 100% Pure Anadulturated Bullshit.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:02 PM
Jan 2016
Now it’s true that Clinton faced an extremely hostile Republican Congress for the last six years of his presidency. But his administration actively encouraged the big deregulatory legislation, and squashed its own dissenters, like Brooksley Born, who saw disaster ahead.

Clinton would have you believe that he signed those bills because his administration was forced to by a GOP that was beholden as usual to Big Business, but then what about the deregulatory legislation he signed in 1994, before Gingrich & Co. took Congress?

Riegle-Neal hasn’t got a tenth of the press that the CMFA and Gramm-Leach-Bliley have, but it was a milestone in the creation of Too Big to Fail, allowing banks to cross state lines, effectively gutting state regulation of banking. The Christian Science Monitor that year quoted a Wall Street analyst saying that, “‘It also didn’t hurt that NationsBank president Hugh McColl has a working relationship with President Clinton or that the comptroller of the currency, Eugene Ludwig, was a successful lawyer at Covington & Burling and NationsBank had been a major client.’” Hugh McColl gave us Bank of America.

From across the pond, The Independent wrote in a piece that was prescient in more ways than one:

“In effect, Congress has said let the merger mania begin. There is virtual consensus that the legislation will allow both the big US banks and their foreign rivals in America - British banks among them - to grow much bigger.
Nor was that the only thing the banks got that year. The American Banking Association wrote about Riegle-Neal, the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994, and the Community Banking Development Act that “the 103rd will be remembered as the first Congress in recent memory to pass “clean” pro-banking legislation.”


Clinton, on signing Riegle-Neal, praised McColl and the head of Chase Manhattan, and said, ” It represents another example of our intent to reinvent Government by making it less regulatory and less overreaching and by shrinking it where it ought to be shrunk and reshaping it where it ought to be reshaped.”

Again, this was before the Republicans took over Congress.

In 1999, on signing Gramm-Leach-Bliley into law, Clinton said, “This is a day we can celebrate as an American day” and that ” the Glass-Steagall law is no longer appropriate for the economy in which we live” and “today what we are doing is modernizing the financial services industry, tearing down these antiquated laws and granting banks significant new authority” and “This is a very good day for the United States.”


http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/bill_clinton_the_republicans_m.php

In June, I attended a dinner for Bill Clinton, which was educational. Clinton spoke passionately about his foundation, about African wildlife, inequality, childhood obesity, and much else with enormous factual command, emotion, and rhetorical power. But he and I also spoke privately. I asked him about the financial crisis. He paused and then became even more soulful, thoughtful, passionate, and articulate. And then he proceeded to tell me the most amazing lies I've heard in quite a while.

For example, Mr. Clinton sorrowfully lamented his inability to stop the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which banned all regulation of private (OTC) derivatives trading, and thereby greatly worsened the crisis. Mr. Clinton said that he and Larry Summers had argued with Alan Greenspan, but couldn't budge him, and then Congress passed the law by a veto-proof supermajority, tying his hands. Well, actually, the reason that the law passed by that overwhelming margin was because of the Clinton Administration's strong advocacy, including Congressional testimony by Larry Summers and harsh public and private attacks on advocates of regulation by Summers and Robert Rubin.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-ferguson/hillary-clinton-documentary_b_4014792.html
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz leftofcool Jan 2016 #1
Never facing the facts. jkbRN Jan 2016 #11
Does greed need an explanation, or is it one? Proserpina Jan 2016 #2
Blah blah blah Gman Jan 2016 #3
Yes he earned the money he received for his speaking. You could say the same about Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #4
Hmmmm? CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #6
It would be interesting to see how you truly link this one. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #31
Either Bill should have collected fees for speaking OR Hillary should have run for president and JDPriestly Jan 2016 #47
Waiting to see the impropriety proof. Wjat would be different in the case Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #49
The comparison is utterly weak. I've already heard about the $200,000 she is said to have JDPriestly Jan 2016 #53
In the case of Bill and Hillary, the places who have agreed to pay Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #57
Charity? Much was funneled to the Global Foundation....what a set up! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #88
Do you seriously think the Republicans will need to prove anything about Hillary? JDPriestly Jan 2016 #71
Well Said... CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #60
equally well stated. +100 eom Karma13612 Jan 2016 #64
You nailed it, as always. I am so afraid that if HRC Karma13612 Jan 2016 #61
Judgement Is Poor On Hillarry's Part... Correctly Stated! CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #87
+1000. eom Karma13612 Jan 2016 #89
Lol... jkbRN Jan 2016 #9
That poster comes up with 840high Jan 2016 #24
Shocking news: People want to pay an ex president who presided over the most successful economy Amimnoch Jan 2016 #28
And the Clinton's also are much more in demand than the George W Bush family. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #32
The speaking fees are not the problem. JDPriestly Jan 2016 #51
In what spacey scenario Plucketeer Jan 2016 #39
Awww. That's a terrible thing to say about Bernie. Laser102 Jan 2016 #43
Yes, it would be. Plucketeer Jan 2016 #44
I Saw "The Big Short" Last Night.. I Highly Recommend That Prior to Casting Your Vote in The Primary CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #5
BOOM jkbRN Jan 2016 #10
I hear it's an excellent movie. azmom Jan 2016 #33
I read the book a couple of years ago. Fuddnik Jan 2016 #40
The primary is the real election abelenkpe Jan 2016 #42
exactly! Karma13612 Jan 2016 #67
^^^THIS^^^ haikugal Jan 2016 #80
+10,000 nt Live and Learn Jan 2016 #54
How dare a former President make money speaking. JoePhilly Jan 2016 #7
Uh yeah, when a president repeals glass stegal jkbRN Jan 2016 #13
Bill did not write GLB. JoePhilly Jan 2016 #15
100% Pure Anadulturated Bullshit. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #30
Jon L., Thank You... As Honest And Thoughtful People Clearly Understand Is The Clear Fact That CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #35
+10000 as usual.. pangaia Jan 2016 #48
So the legislation did NOT pass with a veto proof majority?!?!? tia uponit7771 Jan 2016 #73
Clearly it did. What is BULLSHIT is claiming that Clinton didn't also support it. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #76
You didn't qualify your dismissal and if Clinton didn't support it at all it passes... uponit7771 Jan 2016 #78
Believe what you want. If a President opposes a bill, more nay votes tend to appear. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #79
I don't laud what I want above the facts, I'll leave that up to conservatives. The facts are the ... uponit7771 Jan 2016 #86
More Pay to Play spilled across the laps of corrupt politicians. Fuddnik Jan 2016 #17
Just Da Facts Joe... Just da Facts.. And Da Facts Can Be Painful When Ya Have To Look At Them! CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #18
Hey, you have no power or influence ... JoePhilly Jan 2016 #21
I know the OP. Fuddnik Jan 2016 #29
King of DU? JoePhilly Jan 2016 #55
U.S. House Smart Guy... Biggest Opponent.. The Democratic Party CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #62
Thanks you...for everything! haikugal Jan 2016 #82
Ha! Phlem Jan 2016 #37
Fact is not RW 840high Jan 2016 #26
I wouldnt call it Right Wing Water its more like INdemo Jan 2016 #56
Oh yes, all criticism of a Clinton is rightwing by definition. senz Jan 2016 #66
It's kind of the opposite of right wing... Bradical79 Jan 2016 #70
At the expense of our future! Yes indeed... haikugal Jan 2016 #83
+1 uponit7771 Jan 2016 #74
How do you legislate or negotiate against your DirkGently Jan 2016 #8
Nice Addition To The Foray... Well Described and well Put... CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #20
When the quid is that large, a quo is implied. The rules of the game. Dumbfucks. Elmer S. E. Dump Jan 2016 #38
Excellent post! JDPriestly Jan 2016 #81
So many 'Not Hillary' Party fans use such fancy formatting. onehandle Jan 2016 #12
Are you trying to convey a message? Because your thought, doesn't seem to go anywhere. jkbRN Jan 2016 #14
Dude don't worry about it. Phlem Jan 2016 #63
+1 JoePhilly Jan 2016 #16
+2 n/t JTFrog Jan 2016 #36
oooo, it's the formatting, ouch. Minus eleventy three!!!!!!!! Phlem Jan 2016 #65
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #19
I remember the shit-fit we all had about Reagan going to Japan and getting $3 million for speaking.. Punkingal Jan 2016 #22
As an entertainer he's not so hot. As president he was even worse. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #23
Lynyrd Skynyrd... "Ya Got That Right.... CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #25
Yeah..You got that right...... Iowa INdemo Jan 2016 #58
What? You expected him to help build houses for poor people? jalan48 Jan 2016 #27
BEST reply here.... pangaia Jan 2016 #50
Yeah, all the other progressive works the Clintons have done so far mean nothing at all. :rolleye: uponit7771 Jan 2016 #77
Those speeches won't help us in November (nt) Babel_17 Jan 2016 #34
So what? Bills a gifted speaker. He's earned millions. So what? Laser102 Jan 2016 #41
woosh... SammyWinstonJack Jan 2016 #45
have to agree with you Laser102 - so what? NoMoreRepugs Jan 2016 #46
Oh poor, poor Bill and Hillary.. Nobode likes them. pangaia Jan 2016 #52
actually, I DON'T think actors or athletes should make millions either. I think that is Karma13612 Jan 2016 #68
If Bill wants to give speeches for millions, that's great. JDPriestly Jan 2016 #84
agree. It has become so distorted. Karma13612 Jan 2016 #90
Yawn..... quickesst Jan 2016 #59
I've decided ... NurseJackie Jan 2016 #69
Nothing Like Sticking One's Head... IN THE SAND... Is There? CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #72
"Teh Clinton's are teh evil" is some really rough and ragged sand, better to avoid even walking uponit7771 Jan 2016 #75
She hasn't earned it yet. Maedhros Jan 2016 #85
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»You Decide If MILLIONS "E...»Reply #30