Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Too bad that Hillary fucked over the org she went under cover for. They disavowed her. [View all]senz
(11,945 posts)40. Tch tch! How dare anyone bring up Hillary's past?
Such a toxic thing to do! Oh my, those Sanders supporters.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
156 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Too bad that Hillary fucked over the org she went under cover for. They disavowed her. [View all]
Luminous Animal
Dec 2015
OP
Not only did she champion a policy that would throw more humans into poverty… she characterized them
Luminous Animal
Dec 2015
#1
the welfare rolls were "empty" because the only safety net we had was devastated by the clintons
questionseverything
Dec 2015
#115
NO: the US was in full employment : The Clinton's has one of best economy is history
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#146
Its was the best of times: Check the graphs: We can only dream of what was then now
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#150
There was a boon in technology due to the spending on computers in Clinton's era, BUT...
EndElectoral
Jan 2016
#153
Interesting that you said "they left office" liked they shared the presidency. Clinton isn't
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#130
Make up your mind whether the Clinton's were responsible for the economy during their presidency or
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#147
Welfare roles were almost empty because they kicked people off of welfare.
Luminous Animal
Dec 2015
#138
Bill ran on growing the economy and that's exactly what he did. Take employment for example:
ucrdem
Dec 2015
#139
Yeah, they "disavowed" her by honoring her in 2013 at their 40th Anniversary gala:
Tanuki
Dec 2015
#3
If they disavow her, their view is relevant. If they honor her, they're crooked hypocrites.
Empowerer
Dec 2015
#8
Yes -- and I hope you realize that there really is a difference between actual photos and photo shop
karynnj
Dec 2015
#111
I was not accusing you, but answering your post suggesting I did not know it was a photo shop
karynnj
Dec 2015
#114
Duh, it's Photoshopped. The purpose was not to make you think Trump and Sanders were
JunkyardAngel83
Dec 2015
#126
The irony of that statement is fairly seismic given current events, wouldn't you say??
Number23
Dec 2015
#113
And Black Lives Matter has challenged her on her support or that platform.
Luminous Animal
Dec 2015
#12
False. Marian Wright Edelman has not "disavowed" Hillary, she's a Hillary supporter.
SunSeeker
Dec 2015
#18
It is reprehensible for you to state that Marian Wright Edelman has "abandoned women and children"
Tanuki
Dec 2015
#74
I am not totally sold on either of our potential nominees yet, but your post REEKS.
BillZBubb
Dec 2015
#77
a two-decades old program that was never needed and has never stopped hurting innocent people.
Ken Burch
Dec 2015
#57
Good construction, and still works. A noun, a bash, and Hillary Clinton. Yep. nt
Hekate
Dec 2015
#93
I just left a long thread 'Bernie is just like Trump because both say 'movement' about their
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2015
#99
Hillary stated that she WORKED HARD TO ROUND UP VOTES FOR ITS PASSAGE.
Luminous Animal
Dec 2015
#137
This thread is as awesome as the one where you accused me of plagiarizing my own DU thread.....
msanthrope
Dec 2015
#96
Nope. Not at all. Hillary Clinton touted, as a success, an initiative that has contributed to
Luminous Animal
Dec 2015
#140
It's some racist shit when you use Marian Wright Edelman in the manner you do.
msanthrope
Dec 2015
#142