Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Too bad that Hillary fucked over the org she went under cover for. They disavowed her. [View all]senz
(11,945 posts)39. So you bookmark threads you regard as absurd?
Why? How do you expect to use such threads?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
156 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Too bad that Hillary fucked over the org she went under cover for. They disavowed her. [View all]
Luminous Animal
Dec 2015
OP
Not only did she champion a policy that would throw more humans into poverty… she characterized them
Luminous Animal
Dec 2015
#1
the welfare rolls were "empty" because the only safety net we had was devastated by the clintons
questionseverything
Dec 2015
#115
NO: the US was in full employment : The Clinton's has one of best economy is history
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#146
Its was the best of times: Check the graphs: We can only dream of what was then now
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#150
There was a boon in technology due to the spending on computers in Clinton's era, BUT...
EndElectoral
Jan 2016
#153
Interesting that you said "they left office" liked they shared the presidency. Clinton isn't
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#130
Make up your mind whether the Clinton's were responsible for the economy during their presidency or
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#147
Welfare roles were almost empty because they kicked people off of welfare.
Luminous Animal
Dec 2015
#138
Bill ran on growing the economy and that's exactly what he did. Take employment for example:
ucrdem
Dec 2015
#139
Yeah, they "disavowed" her by honoring her in 2013 at their 40th Anniversary gala:
Tanuki
Dec 2015
#3
If they disavow her, their view is relevant. If they honor her, they're crooked hypocrites.
Empowerer
Dec 2015
#8
Yes -- and I hope you realize that there really is a difference between actual photos and photo shop
karynnj
Dec 2015
#111
I was not accusing you, but answering your post suggesting I did not know it was a photo shop
karynnj
Dec 2015
#114
Duh, it's Photoshopped. The purpose was not to make you think Trump and Sanders were
JunkyardAngel83
Dec 2015
#126
The irony of that statement is fairly seismic given current events, wouldn't you say??
Number23
Dec 2015
#113
And Black Lives Matter has challenged her on her support or that platform.
Luminous Animal
Dec 2015
#12
False. Marian Wright Edelman has not "disavowed" Hillary, she's a Hillary supporter.
SunSeeker
Dec 2015
#18
It is reprehensible for you to state that Marian Wright Edelman has "abandoned women and children"
Tanuki
Dec 2015
#74
I am not totally sold on either of our potential nominees yet, but your post REEKS.
BillZBubb
Dec 2015
#77
a two-decades old program that was never needed and has never stopped hurting innocent people.
Ken Burch
Dec 2015
#57
Good construction, and still works. A noun, a bash, and Hillary Clinton. Yep. nt
Hekate
Dec 2015
#93
I just left a long thread 'Bernie is just like Trump because both say 'movement' about their
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2015
#99
Hillary stated that she WORKED HARD TO ROUND UP VOTES FOR ITS PASSAGE.
Luminous Animal
Dec 2015
#137
This thread is as awesome as the one where you accused me of plagiarizing my own DU thread.....
msanthrope
Dec 2015
#96
Nope. Not at all. Hillary Clinton touted, as a success, an initiative that has contributed to
Luminous Animal
Dec 2015
#140
It's some racist shit when you use Marian Wright Edelman in the manner you do.
msanthrope
Dec 2015
#142