2016 Postmortem

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)

92. Thank you.

Reply to cprise (Reply #10)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:21 PM

Dec 2015

Explanations like this are why I read DU.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

116 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No surprise: Tech sites aren't buying DNC hysteria on breech [View all] cprise Dec 2015 OP

It's all contrived bullshit by Hill Shill DWS. morningfog Dec 2015 #1

Biingo! MissDeeds Dec 2015 #9

I spell "shill" like this: $Hill. Divernan Dec 2015 #26

lol ... thanks for the spelling lesson ;-) Hiraeth Dec 2015 #33

Love it! Plucketeer Dec 2015 #99

+10 artislife Dec 2015 #105

Yeah, she stole the data and gave it to the Sanders campaign. George II Dec 2015 #38

No data was stolen. This is bullshit. morningfog Dec 2015 #48

That is total BlueMTexpat Dec 2015 #70

Shame on Debbie wasserman rove. morningfog Dec 2015 #75

Did you see the activity logs published by Time? Check it out - they took data, LOTS of it. George II Dec 2015 #83

Complete crap CSStrowbridge Dec 2015 #116

LOGIC! THE OP IS BLINDING ME WITH SCIENCE! :D roguevalley Dec 2015 #69

I am an IT officer for a major financial firm that white labels partner-client data. This is serious! TheBlackAdder Dec 2015 #85

Bingo. nt SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #88

I wonder if you would immediately terminate the contract? MyNameGoesHere Dec 2015 #101

Any business that would not have a contingent BR plan in place, isn't trustworthy. TheBlackAdder Dec 2015 #103

Uh huh. MyNameGoesHere Dec 2015 #115

Really, is tech going to sink h? artislife Dec 2015 #107

you missunderstand me, blackadder. I am saluting you. I think I better roguevalley Dec 2015 #113

DWS is detrimental to the democratic party! She needs to be replaced! n/t RKP5637 Dec 2015 #77

All she wants is a Hillary cabinet spot. morningfog Dec 2015 #80

It still doesn't explain why staffers accessed specific data about early voting states. Metric System Dec 2015 #2

Proof. No one would believe that Bernie staffers could access it without proof. And when you get the LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #6

His use of the '_bernie' tag is an excellent point, plus cprise Dec 2015 #14

Found this on /. LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #19

And that site has a ton of Clinton supporters cprise Dec 2015 #24

The Sanders guy didn't "passively browse", he searched for early state voter data........ George II Dec 2015 #40

Will an Independant audit be able to discover conclusively whether or not the Clinton Campaign Dustlawyer Dec 2015 #45

Of course not. We all know hill actually stole data. morningfog Dec 2015 #50

I think the lawsuit will find that out notadmblnd Dec 2015 #56

He didn't even "browse through a firewall," SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #91

Exactly. It was deliberately blatant, not sneaky at all. n/t arcane1 Dec 2015 #21

BINGO!!! nt SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #89

Because that's where you would most readily find specialized cprise Dec 2015 #10

Thank you. SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #92

Duh-uh! Read Item #3 in the OP's post! Divernan Dec 2015 #29

exactly Champion Jack Dec 2015 #52

Maybe t.hey just querried for information in general, and some of it was Hillary's JDPriestly Dec 2015 #62

The specificity of the searches is damning. joshcryer Dec 2015 #3

The alternative is generating queries that don't find any Clinton-specific data cprise Dec 2015 #20

And yet they added "bernie" to all the user names so everyone would know who it was. arcane1 Dec 2015 #22

I see no evidence they did. joshcryer Dec 2015 #27

A baseless assertion. arcane1 Dec 2015 #30

Appending _something is extremely common in SQL. joshcryer Dec 2015 #31

Exactly n/t arcane1 Dec 2015 #34

So why was he fired? RandySF Dec 2015 #4

Common in IT. "Made the news" Someone has to fall on the sword. SH@T happens. LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #7

I don't think he should have been n/t DVRacer Dec 2015 #8

1. He acted without consent from management. cprise Dec 2015 #11

Bingo. nt SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #93

Excellent post. Thank you for shedding real light on this sad situation. nt 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #5

Yeah ok. Like anyone would risk #4 for #3 JaneyVee Dec 2015 #12

Its done all the time. White hat hacking is an accepted part of IT. eom cprise Dec 2015 #16

Bingo. 99Forever Dec 2015 #13

Here is a good post from slashdot LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #15

This should be its own OP. n/t winter is coming Dec 2015 #18

Yes, it should be mindwalker_i Dec 2015 #25

"We have no information at all on whether anybody from the Clinton side was doing the same thing" arcane1 Dec 2015 #23

HRC specialties:hatchet jobs& knee-capping, ie/ Bimbo Eruption Squad. Divernan Dec 2015 #32

Bimbo Eruption Squad LOL navarth Dec 2015 #87

Google it - just not on a full stomach! Divernan Dec 2015 #106

interesting! Totally different meaning navarth Dec 2015 #109

Post removed Post removed Dec 2015 #35

They were ready like clockwork. Even here there were cries of "crimes" within minutes. arcane1 Dec 2015 #17

HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Dec 2015 #28

K&R valerief Dec 2015 #36

Looks like Bernie will be getting another donation from me TxDemChem Dec 2015 #37

Me too. Enthusiast Dec 2015 #74

K & R. Dont call me Shirley Dec 2015 #39

Kick and R BeanMusical Dec 2015 #41

KICK Segami Dec 2015 #42

This is how the Turd Way rolls folks. jalan48 Dec 2015 #43

Precisely. Enthusiast Dec 2015 #76

This message was self-deleted by its author billhicks76 Dec 2015 #44

"Most already hated her." Yeah, except the vast majority who would either pnwmom Dec 2015 #47

Keep in mind you're talking to somebody who is blaming this breach on Clinton mythology Dec 2015 #51

The Hypocrisy Is Palpable billhicks76 Dec 2015 #54

If They Did They Don't Anymore billhicks76 Dec 2015 #58

Dream on. nt pnwmom Dec 2015 #59

I Have A Dream billhicks76 Dec 2015 #61

Look Who's Backing Down billhicks76 Dec 2015 #64

I heard they backed down, SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #95

Post removed Post removed Dec 2015 #46

LOL " squirrel !!! " cprise Dec 2015 #63

"MSM do not define what is acceptable practice in technology." SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #96

They just never know when to stop, this time I think they went too far. Dustlawyer Dec 2015 #49

Yeah, I think the timing may have blown up in DWS's face... nt SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #97

k & r chervilant Dec 2015 #53

...and all the Hillsters in unison claiming "if you leave your door open..." aspirant Dec 2015 #67

then it's likely that your neighbours will wander in to see if you've had a heart attack Erich Bloodaxe BSN Dec 2015 #102

So, I'm wondering passiveporcupine Dec 2015 #55

The Bernie campaign knee-capped themselves murielm99 Dec 2015 #57

They found a hole the Clinton campaign might have been using all along. They reported it. nt Electric Monk Dec 2015 #65

Prove that Clinton did it. murielm99 Dec 2015 #66

Why do you know the Sander's campaign did? concreteblue Dec 2015 #104

Because they know that HRC does not have a lock on the nomination and Hepburn Dec 2015 #60

She isn't even close to a lock. Enthusiast Dec 2015 #78

Send Bernie another donation, and let the DNC know we have Bernie's back! ViseGrip Dec 2015 #68

Just a minor point ... BlueMTexpat Dec 2015 #71

K&R! This post should have hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Dec 2015 #72

As a programmer who had to debug ccinamon Dec 2015 #73

Thanks for this informative post. mnhtnbb Dec 2015 #79

If the Bernie people REALLY wanted to STEAL the data RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #81

This is the case where Debbie, The Chairwoman, wants to make Bernie look bad, since she rladdi Dec 2015 #82

As time goes by, I am distrusting Clinton more and more each day. Where was her campaign DhhD Dec 2015 #84

LOL. I can't believe that Bernie fans can even convince themselves of this nonsense. DanTex Dec 2015 #86

K/R UglyGreed Dec 2015 #90

5. Profit! Babel_17 Dec 2015 #94

Sending this back to the TOP! l.o.o.s.e.e-2 Dec 2015 #98

Not to mention the fact that it was Clinton cronies who caused the breach to begin with. nt mhatrw Dec 2015 #100

And a kick for this, plus another interesting link from The Register GoneOffShore Dec 2015 #108

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #110

Makes our party's higher ups look incompetent handling sensitive data Babel_17 Dec 2015 #111

This is not how computers work... grendelsd Dec 2015 #112

Oh, they're just silicon valley weenies who dont want to "cooperate" on encryption & web censorship. Warren DeMontague Dec 2015 #114