Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cha

(296,834 posts)
277. ".. but given her history, and the fact that she's still standing after decades of battling the
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 04:57 AM
Aug 2015
forces aligned against her, it is rather ludicrous to even suggest that she requires any protection from anyone."

Indeed.

And, look who wrote the article.. Kristin Powers.. who's written "The Silencing"..

"Lifelong liberal Kirsten Powers blasts the Left's forced march towards conformity in an exposé of the illiberal war on free speech. No longer champions of tolerance and free speech, the "illiberal Left" now viciously attacks and silences anyone with alternative points of view. Powers asks, "What ever happened to free speech in America?"

http://www.amazon.com/The-Silencing-Left-Killing-Speech/dp/1621573702

Sound at all familiar?

LOL.. she's got all the bona fide rwingers giving her wave reviews..

But, one of her points is a little questionable .. I say it's calling out faux "news" for being fooking liars.. I doubt if that's just me.

"•How the illiberal left is obsessed with delegitimizing Fox News"
happy to be the first k and r! nt restorefreedom Aug 2015 #1
Showing Clinton=Bush billhicks76 Aug 2015 #133
ooops restorefreedom Aug 2015 #196
I Was Just Agreeing billhicks76 Aug 2015 #253
aahhhh, ok. am a bit restorefreedom Aug 2015 #259
I think her campaign must be in disarray... CoffeeCat Aug 2015 #297
we should not criticise the nominee, actual or presumptive HFRN Aug 2015 #2
LOL azmom Aug 2015 #3
Yea ok let's just have the DNC select our candidate. We want the people to win. L0oniX Aug 2015 #4
Unless it isn't Hillary AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #130
Fuck your party! pocoloco Aug 2015 #134
Since you vulgarly and rudely refer to "your party", what Party are you? This is Democratic Underground. No (R)..... Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #144
C'mon, Fred... gregcrawford Aug 2015 #190
This is a board for Democrats. murielm99 Aug 2015 #191
You should be more careful with snide innuendoes, Muriel... gregcrawford Aug 2015 #202
There was no innuendo. murielm99 Aug 2015 #262
"a board for Democratic Party members" BeanMusical Aug 2015 #269
Do you mean the new DU? murielm99 Aug 2015 #274
The one overrun by people who like to mass alert and tear down anyone but Bernie? AlbertCat Aug 2015 #300
You've been blocked okasha Aug 2015 #305
AA, Hillary, Interfaith and Prayer Circle, AlbertCat Aug 2015 #316
You so completley misunderstood my comments... gregcrawford Aug 2015 #288
Technically, yes, but if Democrats ozone_man Aug 2015 #251
Technically nothing. murielm99 Aug 2015 #263
Then stop supporting Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #278
Goodbye, murielm99 Aug 2015 #279
Good luck in your support for Hillary. Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #287
wrong - it is a board for those voting for Democrats DrDan Aug 2015 #289
+1 an entire shit load. Enthusiast Aug 2015 #294
This post got alerted... Qutzupalotl Aug 2015 #192
Post removed Post removed Aug 2015 #136
Anne Coulter or Kristen Powers could not have said it better! Am I right? "Hahaha"...is on that level. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #147
??? billhicks76 Aug 2015 #160
What he means is ... Trajan Aug 2015 #205
Id Claim Strange Bedfellows But... billhicks76 Aug 2015 #255
Thank...my last laugh before sleep. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #261
Bam, you nailed it! arlington.mass Aug 2015 #247
Hillary is the presumptive nominee? Elmer S. E. Dump Aug 2015 #208
The party is being hurt by the oligarch control of the Party Elites. It's do or die, literally rhett o rick Aug 2015 #268
it's kind of amazing, how many took my post literally HFRN Aug 2015 #290
We should constructively criticize the party's candidates. That's what helps us win elections. Scuba Aug 2015 #5
The people need to see and hear many debates to make a more informed decision. L0oniX Aug 2015 #7
If that were true polls would move based on debate performance MaggieD Aug 2015 #12
Ah so your solution is to have no debates. Got it. Maybe the DNC will hire you as an unpaid intern. L0oniX Aug 2015 #22
As I said, 6 is plenty MaggieD Aug 2015 #25
4, not 6. jeff47 Aug 2015 #39
If Hillary performs poorly in the early debates ... aggiesal Aug 2015 #198
The nomination will be all but clinched by Super Tuesday. I just hope Sanders concedes graciously. George II Aug 2015 #311
27 Democratic primary debates in 2008 but 6 is plenty for you. L0oniX Aug 2015 #42
I doubt that many people watched murielm99 Aug 2015 #105
Overexposure hurts Hillary, that's for sure. John Poet Aug 2015 #131
Hillary has been in the public eye ... NanceGreggs Aug 2015 #228
The latest polls say so... John Poet Aug 2015 #273
Like it or lump it, my friend ... NanceGreggs Aug 2015 #302
".. but given her history, and the fact that she's still standing after decades of battling the Cha Aug 2015 #277
Her corporate donors... Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #280
It is illegal ... NanceGreggs Aug 2015 #304
And notice that, okasha Aug 2015 #306
"Hillary has as much right to run for office as anyone else" Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #313
" to donate directly " - what a sad response given the post Citizens United reality. Warren Stupidity Aug 2015 #314
No, most folks don't have the time... blackspade Aug 2015 #244
it's outrageous any way you slice it. nashville_brook Aug 2015 #119
Solution for those who want 6: Watch 6. HappyPlace Aug 2015 #231
In 2004, my support for Kerry and Edwards was based on their debate performance. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #124
6 debates is plenty MaggieD Aug 2015 #126
I would have at least 8-10. Probalby 8. Six is far too few. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #201
A dozen would be nice. 20 even better. Fuddnik Aug 2015 #204
There was 26 in 2008 Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #281
Here is HRC on SS at 2008 debates MaggieD Aug 2015 #129
Easy ieoeja Aug 2015 #143
So you're in favor of raising taxes on the middle class? MaggieD Aug 2015 #149
I am 100% in favor of raising taxes on the UPPER middle class. Obama was wrong. ieoeja Aug 2015 #159
The point is that people making over $100,000 per year are in most parts of the country, not JDPriestly Aug 2015 #203
"She is a terrible debater" ...and the DNC know it. That's why the debates are being limited. L0oniX Aug 2015 #209
Who are you quoting? MaggieD Aug 2015 #217
You are so correct. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #233
Wow - that's insane MaggieD Aug 2015 #216
Where do you live? JDPriestly Aug 2015 #230
Terrible debater? Sure, if you say so, but a few dozen nations she engaged with disagree. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #235
We don't know that for sure. She only lasted four years in the State Department. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #237
Clinton's "only 4 years" was a time of a hard earned rebuilding of the destroyed relationship America had with Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #239
Thanks to Obama. Why do you think she left after four years? JDPriestly Aug 2015 #242
She was asked that and answered. Look it up. Four years rebuilding foreign relations. You dismiss that?? Wow. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #243
the alternative of course is increasing full retirement age, decreasing COLA, and perhaps means Warren Stupidity Aug 2015 #315
So in your mind we just debate on and on? Tommy2Tone Aug 2015 #86
No one is suggesting debating on and on. We want several debates jwirr Aug 2015 #132
Hopefully Scott Walker will be elected and we can watch the fireworks! randys1 Aug 2015 #6
I hear the GOP is secretly working with Hitler DNA. L0oniX Aug 2015 #13
I said if Bernie WASNT elected, sheesh randys1 Aug 2015 #32
So... kenfrequed Aug 2015 #23
The irony is that the GOPs best chance is Hillary. zeemike Aug 2015 #150
Under Hillary a SC appointee may be more Wall Street friendly than under Bernie, but said randys1 Aug 2015 #154
And you know this how? zeemike Aug 2015 #163
I read one of your posts yesterday ... Trajan Aug 2015 #207
"Looks like Hillary is a chicken" NCTraveler Aug 2015 #8
Chicken is now sexist? LMFAO L0oniX Aug 2015 #14
Post removed Post removed Aug 2015 #18
Twisty. Chicken has always meant coward. Nice try. L0oniX Aug 2015 #26
I get your attempt at justification. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #28
What makes you think I have to justify shit to you. Try reading the ps: in the op. L0oniX Aug 2015 #35
Because you did use justification as a reply. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #36
Just go ahead and alert on it then if that what you think you are reading. L0oniX Aug 2015 #45
Why would I alert. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #93
They are daring us to alert. murielm99 Aug 2015 #107
Who are "they"? 840high Aug 2015 #115
Chickens? L0oniX Aug 2015 #210
.... 840high Aug 2015 #212
I want the DUer who called a person of color a "house rat" BANNED. I only find YOU using the term. cherokeeprogressive Aug 2015 #224
+1 historylovr Aug 2015 #301
Looks like a jury did some "justification". L0oniX Aug 2015 #214
Yep, good hide. BeanMusical Aug 2015 #271
That's how I've always 840high Aug 2015 #114
I'm a woman and I don't believe the word, "chicken" is sexist. Fawke Em Aug 2015 #85
Male frontrunners who dodge debates have been called "chicken" for decades. FBaggins Aug 2015 #99
I agree. Fawke Em Aug 2015 #312
I seriously don't think fear has anything to do with it passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #321
Since when does chicken mean "woman'? Get real.. whathehell Aug 2015 #109
Did you not get the memo? a2liberal Aug 2015 #97
She is a chickenhawk. WDIM Aug 2015 #98
You were the victim of misrepresentation in an alert.. X_Digger Aug 2015 #248
thanks for the laugh! WDIM Aug 2015 #298
You should have alerted on #6 Mnpaul Sep 2015 #318
I didn't alert-- I served on a jury for the post I replied to. n/t X_Digger Sep 2015 #319
But I think you can now alert on comments made by a jury Mnpaul Sep 2015 #320
Apparently EVERYTHING is now sexist or racist. Its in the memo! 7962 Aug 2015 #181
Kristen Powers is a female Dennis Miller. sufrommich Aug 2015 #15
Can't debate the "valid points" so attack the messenger. Old tactic. L0oniX Aug 2015 #38
True, old "tactic". Which do you think is older, shooting the messenger or playing victim? Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #83
Yes we should give all right wing hacks the benefit of the doubt. emulatorloo Aug 2015 #180
She was a liberal but discovered there was way more money to be made Tommy2Tone Aug 2015 #102
Even a blind clock finds an acorn twice a day tularetom Aug 2015 #104
This! Tommy2Tone Aug 2015 #89
Sexist would have been "hen". Chicken, not so much. MNBrewer Aug 2015 #90
You made a seriously flawed assumption for such a short post. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #103
to insult one woman is not sexist. retrowire Aug 2015 #91
Amazingly short sighted with a lack of insight to what sexism is. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #96
so if i call a black person a coward then im racist? retrowire Aug 2015 #110
Bazinga! 7962 Aug 2015 #182
That's just ridiculous. John Poet Aug 2015 #135
We have been calling men and women chicken for decades or more. I jwirr Aug 2015 #137
FFS, most Hillary haters love warren! Explain that! Nt Logical Aug 2015 #264
Selective sexism.... Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #282
ph god. really? A chicken is a coward and I've heard it used against everyone. Be mad about roguevalley Aug 2015 #317
One look at the first rethug debate kills your argument MaggieD Aug 2015 #9
O yea because the GOP has clown debates we should have limits on Dem debates. WTF L0oniX Aug 2015 #17
Unless we're at 49-51 on Senators MaggieD Aug 2015 #46
Given the enormous number of times Democratic senators vote against the party jeff47 Aug 2015 #56
Got an example? MaggieD Aug 2015 #64
Joe Manchin, Joe Liberman, Chuck Schumer jeff47 Aug 2015 #68
Whta 'dissing," what "crapping?" morningfog Aug 2015 #20
Actually, those are a great reason to have more debates. jeff47 Aug 2015 #49
I get it - Sanders sux and Hillary 840high Aug 2015 #116
You never fail to pit Bernie against Hillary jkbRN Aug 2015 #184
Maggie, I'm interested... MrMickeysMom Aug 2015 #206
I've rarely seen such confidence MoveIt Aug 2015 #296
I think it will backfire for the DNC ram2008 Aug 2015 #10
So here is a hypothetical MaggieD Aug 2015 #16
"People don't vote based on debates" LMFAO L0oniX Aug 2015 #19
Debates are meaningless, which is why the DNC needs to control them. winter is coming Aug 2015 #84
Wonderfully Put! Marty McGraw Aug 2015 #141
Nailed! L0oniX Aug 2015 #215
Genius! n/t ozone_man Aug 2015 #254
There are only a few significant events in a primary contest: announcements and dabates. morningfog Aug 2015 #24
There is 24/7 news MaggieD Aug 2015 #30
You can't deny the affect Obama had on Rmoney with "please proceed" L0oniX Aug 2015 #33
The 24/7 news is easily and usually tuned out, unless there is a big story like a scandal. morningfog Aug 2015 #58
6 is plenty MaggieD Aug 2015 #60
For a front runner, six is too many. For a front runner who is losing support and morningfog Aug 2015 #67
Why not just do away with them then? Hell, why even hold an election? frylock Aug 2015 #34
Again, 6 is plenty MaggieD Aug 2015 #37
27 Democratic primary debates in 2008 but 6 is plenty for you. L0oniX Aug 2015 #40
There are two candidates that disagree with you. frylock Aug 2015 #51
Too bad MaggieD Aug 2015 #53
There are two candidates that disagree with you. frylock Aug 2015 #55
So what? MaggieD Aug 2015 #61
Sew buttons. frylock Aug 2015 #63
Lol, gouda one! BeanMusical Aug 2015 #272
Can you show a post that comes remotely... NCTraveler Aug 2015 #41
27 Democratic primary debates in 2008 ...that's what I call a regular primary. L0oniX Aug 2015 #48
That's what I call watered down. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #54
You wouldn't compromise with 16 debates? L0oniX Aug 2015 #65
Hillary supporters do NOT compromise. John Poet Aug 2015 #140
^^^this^^^ L0oniX Aug 2015 #213
Actually, they do. Fawke Em Aug 2015 #92
Well I support Sanders, and perfer MOM as a 2nd choice, but that's a piss-poor article Armstead Aug 2015 #11
Yes, O'Malley IS trying to be intellectually honest, and he IS! elleng Aug 2015 #50
I'm referring to the journalist and article, not O'Malley Armstead Aug 2015 #57
You don't really expect DWS to be honest about the reason the debates are so few compared to 2008? L0oniX Aug 2015 #218
Interesting article from the author of The Silencing: How the Left Is Killing Free Speech. Metric System Aug 2015 #21
Attack the messenger again? WTF Yea look at who is trying to kill free speech here. L0oniX Aug 2015 #29
BUSTED! Kirsten Powers!! Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #81
YES! Limbaugh and Newsbusters deserve a fair shake here! emulatorloo Aug 2015 #185
Attack the messenger again? AlbertCat Aug 2015 #299
So? elleng Aug 2015 #47
Oh shit. I thought I recognized that name Armstead Aug 2015 #59
Apparently this ex-Fox News "liberal" house pet has found a new home at DU! Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #87
Well she is not alone as far as DU members that speak on Fox goes. L0oniX Aug 2015 #220
You like these ex-Fox News propagandists, you can keep them, they are useful for attacking Clinton. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #234
It's not his new home, Steven Leser has been here a while now Dragonfli Aug 2015 #249
What? How did Steven Lesser get into this, the OP is echoing Kirsten Powers. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #250
I thought the poster mentioned something about a FOX pet liberal DUer Dragonfli Aug 2015 #260
^^^this^^^ L0oniX Aug 2015 #310
Calling her chicken is fowl... FSogol Aug 2015 #27
"fowl" How dare you use such a sexist word! L0oniX Aug 2015 #31
and TRUE!!!!! elleng Aug 2015 #44
You beat me by 40 minutes but sure is TRUE! elleng Aug 2015 #43
A message to Bernie Supporters cosmicone Aug 2015 #52
Wow ...sorry can't respond in full ...too busy LOL. L0oniX Aug 2015 #66
LOL Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #295
Goddamn right.... Splinter Cell Aug 2015 #69
Again, innuendos, conjectural platitudes and unproven allegations cosmicone Aug 2015 #76
And forwarding the chickenscrawling of RW nutjob Kirsten Powers! What does that tell you? Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #79
Let me ask you... Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #284
I guess this means you will be leaving DU when Hillary wins the primary? leftofcool Aug 2015 #78
~ L0oniX Aug 2015 #222
...^ that 840high Aug 2015 #121
+1 Preach it loudly. L0oniX Aug 2015 #221
Good post, Hillary will shine in the debates, she knows facts and she should be able to show she is Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #189
Which is why we are going to have so few of them? daleanime Aug 2015 #256
I bellieve some will be happy only 6 was scheduled. Who needs to run a clown car? Leave this to Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #257
Who needs to prove their ability to campaign in the general election? daleanime Aug 2015 #258
Hillary and the DNC knows that Hillary will be destroyed by Bernie. nt Logical Aug 2015 #265
ummmm yeah cosmicone Aug 2015 #270
I see the red herrings are in full swing. Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #285
If you believe in the power of your ideas, there should be more debates. Uncle Joe Aug 2015 #62
of course they have to keep her exposure to a minimum. bowens43 Aug 2015 #70
"Do you support the TPP, yes or no?" Ikonoklast Aug 2015 #73
"Do you support the XL pipeline, yes or no?" L0oniX Aug 2015 #223
I am for any situation that will get FlatBaroque Aug 2015 #71
That would be getting hrc away from party power. elleng Aug 2015 #72
The DNC Needs Hillary colsohlibgal Aug 2015 #74
You may have hit on something worth investigating. L0oniX Aug 2015 #225
Kirsten Powers? A Fox News Kirsten Powers opinion piece?? Thank you for my daily laugh!! Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #75
You should have seen all the recs Ann Coulter got. leftofcool Aug 2015 #82
Anne Coulter got lots of REC's...on DU?? You have to be kidding me!! Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #88
This OP has 49 recs and counting Cali_Democrat Aug 2015 #111
Not only that, these known RW nutjob opinionators are given the mantle of "messenger" and are defended. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #142
Bernie supporter here, and right-wing hacks are right-wing hacks to me emulatorloo Aug 2015 #188
Hopefully, the other candidates will join O'Malley in his rebellion against the DNC. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #77
What a surprise! The only one's who agree with Debbie Wasserman Schultz are Clinton supporters. delrem Aug 2015 #80
FOUR debates before Iowa/New Hampshire. One of those on Dec. 19th (< 1 wk. before Xmas). stillwaiting Aug 2015 #94
bad blood has already resulted from this. nashville_brook Aug 2015 #118
The bunker mentality has never worked for anyone. One of the biggest jwirr Aug 2015 #152
and, the reason why we got Nixon was b/c of a Centrist Dem nashville_brook Aug 2015 #155
It's not only possible that we will only have 4, it's the most likely outcome. jeff47 Aug 2015 #171
Oh waaaah waaah waaah okasha Aug 2015 #95
Brilliant augmentation. L0oniX Aug 2015 #226
Truth needs no augmentation. okasha Aug 2015 #245
Did Hillary lose a 30 point lead in 2008 . LOL! nt Logical Aug 2015 #266
There is no reason for her to lose her current lead, okasha Aug 2015 #267
She's already lost 21 points, are you saying John Poet Aug 2015 #275
Here's my biggest question Flying Squirrel Aug 2015 #100
If you saw yesterday's press conference, you see why she's shielded. 7962 Aug 2015 #101
You need to listen and watch her Town halls where people ask riversedge Aug 2015 #106
Her "townhall" yesterday was hand picked attendance. Just per usual. 7962 Aug 2015 #156
what do you mean by hand picked? riversedge Aug 2015 #158
I think you are probably right about small groups. But as president she is jwirr Aug 2015 #157
this has been my solemn opinion since the beginning. knr n/t retrowire Aug 2015 #108
+1 ...you've some what restored my confidence in humanity. L0oniX Aug 2015 #227
There is a scenario that must frighten Debbie and Hillary. Bernie NCjack Aug 2015 #112
We don't need a coward in the White House Android3.14 Aug 2015 #113
those debates are needed to sell our candidates to the voting public as a whole nashville_brook Aug 2015 #123
You have that right, but the DNC dislikes the plural use of the noun, "candidate" Android3.14 Aug 2015 #172
K&R. Chicken. She is not a good debater, in other words, she is not a competent candidate. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #117
WTF? She was a very good debater in 2007 and 2008. I remember Jeff Toobin saying it was like Gladys Metric System Aug 2015 #151
Obama was much better. She does not come across as likeable in the debates, and especially JDPriestly Aug 2015 #200
yep, it's called indefensible BS -- IOKIYAHS stupidicus Aug 2015 #120
When she speaks its dry and unmotivating d_legendary1 Aug 2015 #122
"like listening to Ben Stein reading War and Peace" RufusTFirefly Aug 2015 #127
To me she always seems like she does not want to be there. I would jwirr Aug 2015 #161
I don't see the Clintons as ever freezing up in fear Babel_17 Aug 2015 #125
if neither Sanders nor O'Malley can take her out in 6 debates, then they aren't fit for the general. msanthrope Aug 2015 #128
Yep OhWiseOne Aug 2015 #138
the Democratic primary audience is open to both Sanders and O'Malley's platforms msanthrope Aug 2015 #146
That would be true IF this were the general election. However, the primaries jwirr Aug 2015 #164
There's no lack of debates, before and after the early elections... msanthrope Aug 2015 #173
Well as you know your candidate is not doing so well at getting her jwirr Aug 2015 #175
your concern for my candidates message is touching. nt msanthrope Aug 2015 #177
~ L0oniX Aug 2015 #229
oh boo hoo.. Amimnoch Aug 2015 #139
Wealthy, evil industrialists illustrated by the character "Mr. Burns" Zorra Aug 2015 #145
doh Amimnoch Aug 2015 #169
Looks like they don't want a "Democratic" primary where there's more than one candidate. L0oniX Aug 2015 #232
Gotta love all the logical fallacies and strawmen. Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #286
I Guarantee . . . Gamecock Lefty Aug 2015 #148
Haters? This is an election. Chosing a candidate does not indicate hate. jwirr Aug 2015 #166
Primary time flame-throwing, nothing more GitRDun Aug 2015 #153
LOL. I love your cheer. jwirr Aug 2015 #167
In my best Elvis voice.. GitRDun Aug 2015 #197
And I am old enough to have loved Elvis. jwirr Aug 2015 #246
It's unfortunate so many don't know the DNC announced SIX DNC sanctioned debates in 2007... Spazito Aug 2015 #162
The only thing any anti-fact, anti-Hillary crowd wants to shield is a lot of very fact challenged talking points. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #165
Here's some Wiki "facts" for you... L0oniX Aug 2015 #238
Good thing the Democratic Party members, then and now, got sensible about that nonsense. The current schedule was set...when? Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #240
Did they have an exclusivity clause back then? That is my target. Total jwirr Aug 2015 #168
Nope, same dynamics apply during this primary as last... Spazito Aug 2015 #170
Correct. But there is an exclusivity clause - we adopted it from the Rs jwirr Aug 2015 #174
Sadly, we've been adopting a LOT of things from the Rs, I fear. n/t RufusTFirefly Aug 2015 #176
It appears the 'exclusivity clause' has a gaping hole in it... Spazito Aug 2015 #178
That was the Rs. They had a "forum" the night before their debate and jwirr Aug 2015 #179
There is nothing to say any of the candidates would not agree... Spazito Aug 2015 #183
That is pretty much like it used to be. jwirr Aug 2015 #186
And probably will be again when it all shakes out. Spazito Aug 2015 #187
Three of those were before the first one this time. Nt. Juicy_Bellows Aug 2015 #193
I wasn't 'debating' the timing schedule, I was pointing out the numbers n/t Spazito Aug 2015 #194
Fair enough. Juicy_Bellows Aug 2015 #195
So Wiki got it wrong? I count 26 debates. L0oniX Aug 2015 #236
The DNC sanctioned 6 in 2007 just as they have for 2016... Spazito Aug 2015 #241
Wow, 2 of those debates were held as late as April of 2008. Major Hogwash Aug 2015 #283
Full EXPOSURE is Hillary's biggest enemy, not Bernie or any GOPer nikto Aug 2015 #199
I am looking forward to the debates, it will be a time with the DNC candidates on the stage together Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #211
Kristen Powers. LOL... SidDithers Aug 2015 #219
~ L0oniX Aug 2015 #309
If she needs this much coddling and sheltering now, senz Aug 2015 #252
I rec'd because the point is correct dreamnightwind Aug 2015 #276
Long live the Queen!...Long live the Queen!... paleotn Aug 2015 #291
Give me a break Keep-Left Aug 2015 #292
They're doing it to save Bernie Sanders the embarrassment of being thrashed by Cllinton. George II Aug 2015 #293
Being thrashed more than six times, you mean. okasha Aug 2015 #307
~ L0oniX Aug 2015 #308
It is critical. Puzzledtraveller Aug 2015 #303
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»DNC shields Hillary Clint...»Reply #277