Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Thank you for a very succinctly stated OP, Sabrina! K&R! Mnemosyne Aug 2015 #1
The issue that transcended all this concern about Clinton and Sanders is the congress. olegramps Aug 2015 #114
I have seen the electability question addressed time and again. Bubzer Aug 2015 #133
Just a fact Sanders with go down like Mcgoven if the Dem's let the far left wing take over lewebley3 Aug 2015 #157
It's not "a fact" it's your opinion. Many Republicans have expressed interest in voting rhett o rick Aug 2015 #168
The "far left wing" comments always make me shake my head in exasperation. Bubzer Aug 2015 #202
Sanders is very much like MCGovern, Dukkis, Dean, Kucinch, etc etc. lewebley3 Aug 2015 #205
None of the people you mention have had anywhere near the draw Bernie has had. Not even close. Bubzer Aug 2015 #210
What a wonderful complement to Sanders. Those are/were some great Democrats. How odd to see sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #290
I doubt you can provide anything that reasonably proves that a fact. Bubzer Aug 2015 #199
History! lewebley3 Aug 2015 #201
I really shouldn't have to point this out, but simply saying "History!" doesn't prove your point... Bubzer Aug 2015 #204
If one feeds a troll, navarth Aug 2015 #275
This one is on a self-imposed diet for a little while MoveIt Aug 2015 #277
Fair point. Bubzer Aug 2015 #289
Can you support Hillary over the 16 GOP clowns? bjobotts Aug 2015 #288
That's the only question...unless you are in a DU (Dem?) Primary Forum/Group duhneece Aug 2015 #301
So where does Hillary stand on the TPP? You know every Union in the country is sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #254
That sound like an intelligent talking point, brought up by the media, etc. PatrickforO Aug 2015 #280
Because our economy is just exactly like that of 1972, which was a high point in median-- eridani Aug 2015 #299
Bernie more than anyone, knows this. Which is why he repeats, over and over again, that sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #134
The importance of getting control of the congress is paramount. olegramps Aug 2015 #218
When you say the 'party' I guess you have answered your own question. Democrats shamefully sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #309
Your point about the Demo cats lack of courage is well taken. olegramps Aug 2015 #314
Yes, which is why the whole system needs changing and that is up to the people now. Our sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #315
Nonsense. Who ever wins the democratic nomination will be president bjobotts Aug 2015 #287
If Sanders is elected and the Republicans continue their control of congress .... AlbertCat Aug 2015 #305
This why I can support Hillary: She is the most quailfied and she is the most popular Dem! lewebley3 Aug 2015 #141
She is popular only because she has had decades in the spotlight, Bernie was a virtual unknown sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #149
Hillary is popular becasue of the Hard work she has done for Dem's and America lewebley3 Aug 2015 #154
That's a load, and you know it. anacodainfl Aug 2015 #156
Qualified for what? For fighting wars in the middle east? For capitulating to Goldman-Sachs. rhett o rick Aug 2015 #170
I do support Hillary and don't support Sanders: Hillary is the most quaified to serv and a Dem lewebley3 Aug 2015 #200
Good for you. nt Mnemosyne Aug 2015 #211
Is DU representative of party or has it become an echo chamber? olegramps Aug 2015 #229
"I would better welcome a major increase... tazkcmo Aug 2015 #241
Bernie will not 'reach across the aisle' on issues that Republicans won't budge on, such as SS. sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #256
bleep blorp frylock Aug 2015 #234
So do I. She's the best and most electable. juajen Aug 2015 #296
Well said. I stand with you. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Aug 2015 #2
more simply 'she is a corporatist' HFRN Aug 2015 #3
The Clinton foudation is a charity: Hillary is not a corporatist, GO Hillary GO lewebley3 Aug 2015 #142
she is good, her critics are bad nt HFRN Aug 2015 #167
Right? Bubzer Aug 2015 #208
When did Bernie Sanders have to make tough decisions? When did he have to consider the views of a Metric System Aug 2015 #4
You are clearly not familiar with his record. Both Hillary and Sanders served in the US Senate. sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #7
And apparently she still has a lot yet to study about the TPP and TPA before taking solid stances... cascadiance Aug 2015 #24
Hillary has been many political fights: Sanders none: He lives in one party rule lewebley3 Aug 2015 #146
Derp! HappyMe Aug 2015 #250
They served only two years in the Senate together. merrily Aug 2015 #303
lol. if Vermont had been gung ho about war with Iraq cali Aug 2015 #9
if Vermont wasn't a progressive and pacifist stronghold, Sanders would never have been elected. bettyellen Aug 2015 #44
Bernie has shown good jugment because he makes decisions based on rock-solid JDPriestly Aug 2015 #70
thank you for your thoughtful reply. I rarely say anything because the usual responses have been bettyellen Aug 2015 #80
You are describing the corruption of our system. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #88
Except he doesn't have a narrow platform he has the broadest platform of sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #131
The characterization of "narrow platform" actually came from some old friends who have bettyellen Aug 2015 #136
Vermont is filled with good ol'boys, business people...ordinary people Armstead Aug 2015 #235
Sure, but it's still not actually diverse like most more populated states. bettyellen Aug 2015 #237
It doesnlt have large urban metrolpolises, true Armstead Aug 2015 #238
It's not just the density, but that's part of it. bettyellen Aug 2015 #255
New York is dfferent from Vermont: Bernie could never be a Senator of New York lewebley3 Aug 2015 #148
True. NY is a very large and mixed bag for sure. bettyellen Aug 2015 #159
Why? Armstead Aug 2015 #239
You guys really need to coordinate your stories better. jeff47 Aug 2015 #11
Yes, the endorsements question is one that ignores the facts as follows: cascadiance Aug 2015 #21
Thanks. Excellent posts. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #75
Excellent points, thank you! sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #140
Coordinate? Oh, you think I work for Hillary's campaign or something? If so, where's my cheque?!? Metric System Aug 2015 #110
there are other words that are more fitting, but I suspect that ChairmanAgnostic Aug 2015 #144
I suppose that would say more about you than me. Metric System Aug 2015 #214
Nope. ChairmanAgnostic Aug 2015 #232
No, you don't have to work for her campaign to coordinate. jeff47 Aug 2015 #264
Well, I haven't coordinated with anyone. Period. Metric System Aug 2015 #272
If Clintons win the Presidency: Happy Days lewebley3 Aug 2015 #150
... for the wealthy amongst us who will celebrate our move to corporate rule with her in charge... cascadiance Aug 2015 #155
I not wealthy I am progressive: I want a comptent fight with Hillary in charge: Go Hillary lewebley3 Aug 2015 #160
Good point TheFarS1de Aug 2015 #283
Bernie Sanders faced those very same tough decisions Facility Inspector Aug 2015 #43
Never, has Sanders had a tough decision: His Vermont 95 white liberal, and few interests lewebley3 Aug 2015 #152
Nonsense. Utter nonsense. Comparisons are one thing, another thing are these sweeping generalizations without meaning. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #153
Yup. Agschmid Aug 2015 #242
I think your data may be suspect. zappaman Aug 2015 #252
So votes on IWR and USAPATRIOT weren't Hard Choices™? frylock Aug 2015 #65
It is interesting to me... kenfrequed Aug 2015 #72
Yeah "tough decision" is Bush-speak. nt sibelian Aug 2015 #84
It's hard work. frylock Aug 2015 #95
Hillary has been out in front leading the party: and taking risk and making difference lewebley3 Aug 2015 #162
huh... kenfrequed Aug 2015 #176
Sanders sat in the Senate: He's talker: There is nothing fresh air about Sanders: lewebley3 Aug 2015 #183
Uhm... kenfrequed Aug 2015 #187
Hillary is more progressive because she has actually gotten progressive things done! lewebley3 Aug 2015 #213
Hmm kenfrequed Aug 2015 #253
...shouldn't feed the trolls, friends navarth Aug 2015 #278
Sorry about that. kenfrequed Aug 2015 #298
I can't tell if that poster is satire dreamnightwind Aug 2015 #316
Yup, and it's crap. Agschmid Aug 2015 #244
Sen Sanders has been working hard with the Democrats. He has agreed with the Democratic majority rhett o rick Aug 2015 #189
Hillary has work for Dem's who are not the 99% and Serv email thing: Is just a GOP thing lewebley3 Aug 2015 #206
I agree completely. H. Clinton works for the 1%. The email thing was wrong. rhett o rick Aug 2015 #270
Honestly your posts are rediculous. Agschmid Aug 2015 #243
You are right: Sanders is not prepared to be President: I think the GOP are behind Sanders lewebley3 Aug 2015 #145
Sure thing... GoneOffShore Aug 2015 #295
I won't vote for her because she's just another ambitious politician seeking power at any cost. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #5
This is my opinion too although I also agree with the OP as well. Cleita Aug 2015 #19
Yep. Who even knows what she wants to DO with the presidency? Jester Messiah Aug 2015 #85
k&r cali Aug 2015 #6
She also exercised poor judgement in moving her emails to private servers... cascadiance Aug 2015 #8
5) It is absoutely fantastic fodder for attack ads. jeff47 Aug 2015 #13
She fantatistic fodder for attack ads: because she is a winner: Sanders is a loser lewebley3 Aug 2015 #163
No because she has a ton of baggage. The Republicans are looking forward to her running as rhett o rick Aug 2015 #174
Hillary is the cleanest poltiics out there today: She has been investigate by the GOP! lewebley3 Aug 2015 #177
The first thing Jeb will hit her with is, "Remember when the chips were down in 2002 rhett o rick Aug 2015 #178
Jeb's a loser: Bush made the choice for war not Hllary: The Clintons made a different choice lewebley3 Aug 2015 #184
So Hillary wasn't active as a Senator then and making that choice with the rest of the Senate then? cascadiance Aug 2015 #188
H. Clinton not only supported the war but helped sell the Republican lies. She should have told rhett o rick Aug 2015 #193
No Hillary didn't do anything selling of the war: Bush,Cheney and GOP did that: lewebley3 Aug 2015 #203
. Dragonfli Aug 2015 #260
ty Go Vols Aug 2015 #263
2008 demonstrated just how much of a winner she is. jeff47 Aug 2015 #266
It's Monty Python...The Argument Clinic... ms liberty Aug 2015 #286
LOL, you made me go and watch it dreamnightwind Aug 2015 #317
I admit I have paid little attention to this issue, mainly because I am suspicious of Republicans' sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #16
If emails were audio tape . . . Facility Inspector Aug 2015 #45
Truly great post. You should post it as an OP. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #77
...^ that 840high Aug 2015 #125
This Server story is a creation of the GOP and the New York times rag: Hillary has good judgement lewebley3 Aug 2015 #166
The Benghazi part IS a creation of the GOP, but SHE created the situation to allow this story... cascadiance Aug 2015 #171
#3...I have been wondering if anyone else saw this point... ms liberty Aug 2015 #282
And if the problems were what #3 discusses, then she missed an opportunity to show leadership! cascadiance Aug 2015 #294
+1 Zorra Aug 2015 #313
I won't support her because she stands for absolutely nothing except herself and her own ambition. TwilightGardener Aug 2015 #10
So true. 840high Aug 2015 #126
Hillary stands for the Dem party: but there nothing wrong with ambition, ambition is a good thing lewebley3 Aug 2015 #175
Did she or didn't she move government email to her own private servers? HUH? cascadiance Aug 2015 #185
It's more sexist to say that a woman can't be equally as self motivated as any man. sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #291
Her poor judgment has been an ongoing problem and I will not spend another minute of my life Autumn Aug 2015 #12
I would rather vote for Sanders, too HassleCat Aug 2015 #14
That's entirely up to you. If you vote for one because it's all you had left, and you get 8 jtuck004 Aug 2015 #18
Maybe I'm asking it wrong HassleCat Aug 2015 #23
Don't have to envision anything. I just look at history and current events. People don't change jtuck004 Aug 2015 #56
I think we still have options. Eg, no matter who is in the WH, they cannot do much harm OR good sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #20
Depends on the political situation in your state and at the time. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #82
I agree artislife Aug 2015 #15
We have to work on Congressional elections also. The president, good or bad, cannot do much sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #25
I was pretty happy with my reps artislife Aug 2015 #28
I hate to be this way, but Murray and Cantwell both voted for NAFTA and for CAFTA and their TPP Bluenorthwest Aug 2015 #34
Sanders people are always attack Dem's lewebley3 Aug 2015 #195
Wonderfully put JackInGreen Aug 2015 #17
oh my god! retrowire Aug 2015 #22
And Sabrina won't get locked out of her own thread MoveIt Aug 2015 #33
wait, the other user got locked out? why? n/t retrowire Aug 2015 #38
Got a well-deserved hide in that thread MoveIt Aug 2015 #47
No, no, no... Maedhros Aug 2015 #165
BIG K&R!!!!! -nt- 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #26
Thank you. This OP deserves 1,000 recs. n/t totodeinhere Aug 2015 #27
I totally agree... kjackson227 Aug 2015 #29
Sabrina, What I Find Interesting . . . Gamecock Lefty Aug 2015 #30
I am willing to BET that you are wrong about that. You are free to go to my journal sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #53
I agree regarding the Hillary camp ybbor Aug 2015 #78
Hillary supporters focus on her 30 years of leading the Dem party lewebley3 Aug 2015 #196
lol Go Vols Aug 2015 #262
Post removed Post removed Aug 2015 #190
k and r nashville_brook Aug 2015 #31
I'm with you! tinkerbelle Aug 2015 #32
K&R silverweb Aug 2015 #35
Those who question Bernie's status as a Democrat should recall what HRC said about PBO in '08 RufusTFirefly Aug 2015 #36
Clinton and McCain VS Obama Oilwellian Aug 2015 #310
Fascinating stuff! Recommended viewing! Thanks so much for posting! RufusTFirefly Aug 2015 #311
Kicketty Kickin' Faux pas Aug 2015 #37
You said it much more elegantly than I could, thanks. abakan Aug 2015 #39
Sabrina, you and I must have been twins switched at birth. closeupready Aug 2015 #40
well done! k and r bbgrunt Aug 2015 #41
Thank You For Sharing - I Share Your Sentiments cantbeserious Aug 2015 #42
Well said MissDeeds Aug 2015 #46
Like most Americans, regardless of partisanship, I. WANT. CHANGE. chknltl Aug 2015 #48
+1K Gigabear Aug 2015 #59
Like I have said before. WHEN CRABS ROAR Aug 2015 #74
Wow, what an intelligent post. Vattel Aug 2015 #49
If someone does not support Obama then of course the same one would not support Clinton! It is only natural. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #50
Not seeing how that works. sibelian Aug 2015 #57
I supported Obama for the same reasons I am now supporting Bernie. sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #58
I do hope all of the current Party members support the current President and current Democratic Party leader, to be replaced on January 7, 2017 Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #60
Sanders doesn't support Obama lewebley3 Aug 2015 #191
Define "support" frylock Aug 2015 #71
Ask the OP writer first, it is her OP and word, not mine. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #73
Well, you're not in much of a position to declare who supports *anything* then, are you? sibelian Aug 2015 #83
You are not being clear. I did not mention Obama in the OP because he isn't running sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #87
You brought it up, that's why I asked you. frylock Aug 2015 #92
You are not making sense passiveporcupine Aug 2015 #137
you might take note of the difference in simple respect in this thread, per your op and maggies. seabeyond Aug 2015 #51
You might take note of the disrespect in Maggie's OP towards another candidate sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #62
nothing said that is not glowing baout sanders is disrespect. yet, with clinton, it is analyzing. seabeyond Aug 2015 #64
So are you still a Bernie supporter? As for this OP it is all about issues, maybe Hillary's sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #76
as maggies was about issues. no. i stopped being a sander supporter about the time seabeyond Aug 2015 #79
by the way. i see the primary as a time to learn, listen and feel out our candidates and seabeyond Aug 2015 #81
Bernie supporters don't stalk bernie supporters or hillary supporters for that matter. Your claim sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #99
i was discussing the issue of social and economic inequality sabrina. i was discussing his campaign seabeyond Aug 2015 #106
You stated you dropped your support for Bernie after Bernie supporters 'alert stalked' you. sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #115
we do not see eye to eye on this. different positions sabrina. i think i am right, you seabeyond Aug 2015 #223
So you agree with Maggie LiberalLovinLug Aug 2015 #127
i didnt go back to see her exact words. i have a reply to her that articulates exactly what i agree seabeyond Aug 2015 #233
There are quite a few posters who have claimed to be Sanders supporters... demmiblue Aug 2015 #93
your interpretation is incorrect which is likely when you need to tell yourself a seabeyond Aug 2015 #103
Stop personally attacking me, seabeyond. demmiblue Aug 2015 #116
Series!!1!1!!! Lol. You tell duers who they really support regardless of what they say seabeyond Aug 2015 #217
People noted that tactic on DK also. I guess the aim was to get 'on the inside' and 'attack from sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #105
Yes, way too obvious. demmiblue Aug 2015 #111
You are right the GOP is using Sanders to attack Hillary lewebley3 Aug 2015 #192
Yawn demmiblue Aug 2015 #69
hardly ibegurpard Aug 2015 #90
because supporters are not part of the problem with clinton and supporters are part of the problem seabeyond Aug 2015 #91
Maggie brought it on herself ibegurpard Aug 2015 #101
yes. of course she did. says a supporter that might of helped her be kicked off for her opinion. seabeyond Aug 2015 #104
I rarely alert on people ibegurpard Aug 2015 #120
Jury results pintobean Aug 2015 #247
Now an unfounded personal attack on ibegurpard. demmiblue Aug 2015 #123
Jury results for this post PeaceNikki Aug 2015 #222
ty. so it begins. or began a couple days ago, lol. thanks. nt seabeyond Aug 2015 #225
I have to disagree with you on this. aquamarina Aug 2015 #139
cute ;) seabeyond Aug 2015 #236
+1 Go Vols Aug 2015 #268
Summing this up, your single word is EXACTLY why I'm supporting Clinton, she's shown better... George II Aug 2015 #52
lolwut? n/t retrowire Aug 2015 #102
yeh that Iraq War vote was brilliant Armstead Aug 2015 #261
well I'll give Hillary this credit azurnoir Aug 2015 #297
"I cannot support anyone who has to evolve on major issues." 40RatRod Aug 2015 #54
To me, modifying personal positions based on evidence and personal reflection is an asset...but that is me. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #61
Sorry, Bernie didn't modify his record, he didn't have to. He agreed to talk MORE sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #94
I am learning about Sanders, it is true I knew little, and the same with O'M, and I have no problem Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #109
We probably are reading from the same progressive book. And the downward tragectory sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #292
However, modifying personal positions out of political expediency.. frylock Aug 2015 #98
Then, I concede, there are others able to divine the inner intent and morals on all issues of those they have Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #112
So you HONESTLY believe that Clinton, in her 60s, just had an epiphany.. frylock Aug 2015 #117
Of course I do - as much as I hope Sanders has a similar epiphany about gun control and Israel. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #118
Where do the candidates differ on the subject of Israel? frylock Aug 2015 #121
That's fine, but for those who suffered as a result of legislation Hillary didn't just sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #312
But around here Sanders' claim to fame has been that he hasn't changed in 40 years! George II Aug 2015 #265
Excellent. gregcrawford Aug 2015 #55
Yawn ismnotwasm Aug 2015 #63
awww, so you do care. Phlem Aug 2015 #68
K&R! K&R! K&R! K&R! Phlem Aug 2015 #66
Exactly kenfrequed Aug 2015 #67
Correct again! d_legendary1 Aug 2015 #86
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Aug 2015 #89
Recommended. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #96
This message was self-deleted by its author mckara Aug 2015 #97
You missed a word. "Why I do NOT support HRC." AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #100
You're Right! I misread It mckara Aug 2015 #107
no worries AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #119
"Judgement" is exactly why I DO support her. leftofcool Aug 2015 #108
Judgment and experience and a continuation of the yet to be written Obama Legacy, and the Big Dog again in the WH..what is there not to support? Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #124
As always Sabrina, Paka Aug 2015 #113
Why I do not support Hillary Clinton. 145 recs and counting. Why I don't support Bernie totodeinhere Aug 2015 #122
the presidency of Dennis Kucinich..... predicted by this forum...... msanthrope Aug 2015 #128
Yes, they had us "pragamatically" move to John Edwards... cascadiance Aug 2015 #135
Whooooosh...... msanthrope Aug 2015 #172
None of his supporters show up? Sorry WRONG!! I'm an active PCP... cascadiance Aug 2015 #181
If it were only DU you would have a point. This isn't back in the 'nineties, we have sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #259
I am well aware of Dennis so I don't need any history lessons from you. totodeinhere Aug 2015 #248
Bernie is getting the same level of support on EVERY Liberal forum. This isn't the 'nineties or the sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #320
rec 154 840high Aug 2015 #130
Up to 208. The other thread is stuck at 84. So my prediction was accurate. n/t totodeinhere Aug 2015 #249
K&R SamKnause Aug 2015 #129
Iraq, Honduras, Libya, Syria MisterP Aug 2015 #132
Those alone should be sufficient. Maedhros Aug 2015 #169
Why cannot support Sanders; He is not Presidental material:He has never been test! lewebley3 Aug 2015 #138
He has passed the most important test of all. And that is what makes him sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #143
Sanders has never demonstrated leadership, 2 young women had him running from the stage lewebley3 Aug 2015 #198
nonsense. he's been tested. tested a lot more than Obama when he first ran. cali Aug 2015 #161
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Aug 2015 #147
Man, you really are polite. daybranch Aug 2015 #151
I like the way sabrina synthesizes it down to judgement... cascadiance Aug 2015 #164
As well as supporting Bernie.... V0ltairesGh0st Aug 2015 #158
Completely agree and floriduck Aug 2015 #173
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Aug 2015 #179
HRC will back he cabinet with Dem's! lewebley3 Aug 2015 #197
Why I will do everything in my power to make sure the next President is a Democrat randys1 Aug 2015 #180
Very simple. Helen Borg Aug 2015 #182
Bingo. CharlotteVale Aug 2015 #186
as a citizen of the planet first, her relationship with BC was always a killer for me stupidicus Aug 2015 #194
I cannot support anyone who has to evolve on major issues. Fred Friendlier Aug 2015 #207
I want people that can evolve, that means they are thinkers with hearts, and not ideologues lewebley3 Aug 2015 #219
Government is not a therapy session where people go to evolve. While they are evolving sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #251
I look forward to the reaction of many here YoungDemCA Aug 2015 #209
Here's another example of Hillary's poor RECENT judgement. robertpaulsen Aug 2015 #212
What utter nonsense; know one runs Hillary, but Hillary: She is her own person! a Dem lewebley3 Aug 2015 #215
Spellchek is yur freind. robertpaulsen Aug 2015 #216
Go Hillary GO: lewebley3 Aug 2015 #220
Hillary could be very rich, if she wanted a job with Monsanto: She has chosen pubic ser lewebley3 Aug 2015 #226
Are you joke trollin' me?! robertpaulsen Aug 2015 #231
It takes one to know one. Or something. Helen Borg Aug 2015 #227
Hillary is not interested in money: if she wanted more she coud have ha Billion by now! lewebley3 Aug 2015 #228
Nobody can know another person's intentions. Helen Borg Aug 2015 #230
Shouldn't that be "Why I do not Support Hillary Clinton in the Primary"...nt SidDithers Aug 2015 #221
But you see... Helen Borg Aug 2015 #224
No. LeftOfWest Aug 2015 #245
I like your sigline. sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #246
With the exception of feminism, Hillary holds neither my values nor my ethics. senz Aug 2015 #240
The $250,000 speeches to Citibank/Canadian banks were also poor judgement Dems to Win Aug 2015 #257
K & R & +1 for pissing off all the right people. L0oniX Aug 2015 #258
Interesting. I'd say being pissed off and pissing others off seems to be bettyellen Aug 2015 #267
~ L0oniX Aug 2015 #269
I couldn't agree with you more, nor said it so well. Thanks. williesgirl Aug 2015 #271
Best post ever. LittleGirl Aug 2015 #273
Hillary's vote for the IWR was a deal breaker for me Martin Eden Aug 2015 #274
knr - I posted on Facebook Douglas Carpenter Aug 2015 #276
INCOMING!! n/t Still In Wisconsin Aug 2015 #279
This is the best summary I've seen! ozone_man Aug 2015 #281
K&R MoveIt Aug 2015 #284
K & R a million time! SoapBox Aug 2015 #285
Just be thankful.... MaggieD Aug 2015 #293
As usual you have inverted the truth values of what actually happened. MoveIt Aug 2015 #300
It's just another one of those "Look at me" threads leftofcool Aug 2015 #304
Sanders also voted no on Telecom Act of 1996, Gramm, Leach, Bliley. merrily Aug 2015 #302
Thank you, he has been right on so many issues it's hard to put it all into one sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #307
Distraction is certainly one way of many to describe it. merrily Aug 2015 #308
Well said. We cannot afford Clinton's "mind conservative" approach. DirkGently Aug 2015 #306
Very good post. People have begun to asking the question you answered regarding what sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #319
Rec # 304 Fumesucker Aug 2015 #318
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why I do not Support Hill...»Reply #140