Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: please just stop it. [View all]
 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
106. I'm pretty sure you are doing your part to promote that perception on social media
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 12:36 PM
Aug 2015

You certainly are doing you part here on DU. Remember your statement very recently?


Hillary gets the blame, sorry. And she is, so if she doesn't like this, then she needs to

tell her supporters this is only harming HER.
please just stop it. [View all] cali Aug 2015 OP
Who is saying her campaign is trying to sabotage Bernie using BLM? Fearless Aug 2015 #1
A segment of the DU population. Agschmid Aug 2015 #3
nah, it's not a good portion of du. cali Aug 2015 #4
I edited. Agschmid Aug 2015 #6
thanks. cali Aug 2015 #9
could have fooled me..... BooScout Aug 2015 #8
you're evidently easily fooled. cali Aug 2015 #10
Naaaaaaa BooScout Aug 2015 #16
Numbers of recs and posts. That is about as reliable as political polls this early in the season. jwirr Aug 2015 #100
not really Duckhunter935 Aug 2015 #5
Because she hasn't appeared at any public events? Fuddnik Aug 2015 #60
How they don't get that is beyond me. Nt NCTraveler Aug 2015 #102
and 'they', being another form of 'them' Marty McGraw Aug 2015 #121
Sorry. Don't get what you are saying. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #122
is that because the Public Marty McGraw Aug 2015 #119
HRH diligently and studiously avoids mingling with the peasantry. hifiguy Aug 2015 #149
All across Social Media Hillary IS being blamed so rightly or wrongly sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #12
And there we have it. Agschmid Aug 2015 #13
Yes, the reality of what these protests have done. I thought I was pretty clear sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #17
I wonder if people actually read the stuff they write? n/t 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #18
They don't. Agschmid Aug 2015 #20
Facts are facts. No one should ever have supported these tactics from the beginning. sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #25
The "facts"? ... Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #31
Uh huh zappaman Aug 2015 #50
Well at least you're honest about it! sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #153
Honesty. zappaman Aug 2015 #154
Normally I would ask for proof of that 'stuff' you just made up. sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #156
Pure speculation, innuendo and personal opinion are now "facts", did you not get the memo from Fox? Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #64
I remember a time when DU used to laugh at such crap ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #70
I am still laughing! And not worrying much about the nonsensical rantings, there are a few folks like you keeping it real. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #73
LOL. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #76
What's with all this ganging up on one member of DU? Marty McGraw Aug 2015 #125
People who tell inconvenient truths that contradict the groupthink hifiguy Aug 2015 #151
Looks so to be the Case Marty McGraw Aug 2015 #160
What did she say that wasn't factual? Fawke Em Aug 2015 #110
Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #113
Can't see Hill getting tangled up in the middle of a half baked internet oasis Aug 2015 #46
She probably isn't tangled up in it. That's what political operatives are for. sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #49
If this incident is presented to her by the media, then and only oasis Aug 2015 #54
"many people" I've seen you speak for the American people before. R B Garr Aug 2015 #63
Are you speaking for the American people now? sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #81
"deny that reality" You just can't help yourself. R B Garr Aug 2015 #93
Well said. zappaman Aug 2015 #101
For Pete's sake, Sabrina did not say that it's true that Fawke Em Aug 2015 #117
Please. She's all over this thread saying that Clinton is responsible. R B Garr Aug 2015 #120
Actually she did say that Sheepshank Aug 2015 #124
Why? Marty McGraw Aug 2015 #128
lol, what?? What "other side" are you talking about?? R B Garr Aug 2015 #132
I'm pretty sure you are doing your part to promote that perception on social media Sheepshank Aug 2015 #106
And I think you believe a conspiracy theory. Agschmid Aug 2015 #92
Couldn't POSSIBLY have anything to do with comments like these...!!! MADem Aug 2015 #118
Your biased interpretations of what you read on social media aren't facts. R B Garr Aug 2015 #59
I can clearly remember a day in June 1968, so no, not just image. irisblue Aug 2015 #79
So BLM protestors are now armed assassins? R B Garr Aug 2015 #96
I did not write that, I did not say that. You are in error if that's what you think irisblue Aug 2015 #103
Of course you implied it. Sheepshank Aug 2015 #109
Let's put two and two together: R B Garr Aug 2015 #112
If you want to talk about ME this probably isn't the place. I prefer to stick to sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #146
Your (mis)interpretations are not "facts." That is the point, and when R B Garr Aug 2015 #148
Good grief. Skidmore Aug 2015 #126
and I agree. This whole issue, if not a tactic by bbgrunt Aug 2015 #144
So do I. I have a quote from you about heckling as a tactic and the gay people who used it: Bluenorthwest Aug 2015 #57
I have evolved. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #71
of course you have ibegurpard Aug 2015 #82
As apparently many formerly strident critics haved. And what I say to them I say to you, which is Bluenorthwest Aug 2015 #135
OUCH! That's gonna leave a mark. Seems this "evolution" thing is like a "Free Pass" on any issue.... Indepatriot Aug 2015 #114
Wrongly so...you blame Hillary Sheepshank Aug 2015 #15
I thought it was hilarious that you and others were making demands of Sen. Sanders sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #21
Sad that you attempt to make me responsible for other's statements.... Sheepshank Aug 2015 #28
I mostly agree with this. Agschmid Aug 2015 #42
The poster evidently believes that is how you define "fact" zappaman Aug 2015 #43
Well... Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #62
Living in ones own world can be fun zappaman Aug 2015 #83
Well, if you say so. Nice button, enjoy that world, though frankly I would sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #90
Sneering bullies are generally not happy people. Vattel Aug 2015 #162
Thank you, and I agree, about how unhappy sneering bullies are. sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #164
The poster said "Hillary gets the blame. Sorry" By 8 o'clock last night anyone who was watching jwirr Aug 2015 #108
Thank you, stating a fact creates quite stir it seems. Bernie Sanders defended Hillary sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #155
"take credit for your own statement instead of deflecting? " I read that as defecating, lol. bettyellen Aug 2015 #158
That too lol Sheepshank Aug 2015 #159
It broke the tension of this thread for me, ha ha bettyellen Aug 2015 #161
Why should her campaign say they're NOT involved? George II Aug 2015 #38
Because her campaign and surrogates ibegurpard Aug 2015 #45
Thank you for your reasoned and accurate assessment. Fawke Em Aug 2015 #97
Thank you, that is exactly what people are saying. Wnen something makes no sense sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #98
So it must be Hillary and not a Republican? Sheepshank Aug 2015 #123
And I am with you on that. zeemike Aug 2015 #116
I LOVE this post hifiguy Aug 2015 #150
I didn't bookmark or copy/paste them, but... George II Aug 2015 #26
Have you actually read this forum this morning? nt Adrahil Aug 2015 #27
Here is one of the more blatantly obvious ones.... George II Aug 2015 #33
Here is another one: George II Aug 2015 #40
Mostly twitter and facebook. They went wild last night. jwirr Aug 2015 #99
Kick. Agschmid Aug 2015 #2
"absolutely isn't behind this" aspirant Aug 2015 #139
Not my job. Agschmid Aug 2015 #141
Then demanding Proof from anyone else aspirant Aug 2015 #142
Yah I wasn't making demands... Agschmid Aug 2015 #143
The proof is in the abosute lack of evidence. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #157
No one is ever obligated to do the right thing. That's why it's a matter of -honor- HereSince1628 Aug 2015 #7
Nailed it Marty McGraw Aug 2015 #133
Regardless, it's a campaign tactic. We are in the middle of a campaign. As to her connection to GoneFishin Aug 2015 #11
And it could also be someone else that is hoping for a twofer. What better way could you use to A Simple Game Aug 2015 #41
Lack of proof is no proof of no connection?!? Argue from ignorance much....? Moonwalk Aug 2015 #87
I was not the one who asserted that there was not a connection. No. And you ... ? GoneFishin Aug 2015 #91
Stop what?? Thinking for ourselves? YOU are entitled to YOUR opinion. sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #14
Because this division isn't good for the party... Agschmid Aug 2015 #23
Yes, from the beginning ti was intended to divide the party. And people here sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #29
This "division" is not within our party. BLM is not a Democratic Party-affiliated group. Please Hortensis Aug 2015 #39
"Good Democrats, lifelong Democrats" Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #66
Stalking again? sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #74
Nope, reading a thread Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #78
More stalking behavior, which has gone on for a very long time now. sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #84
Keep playing the victim, Sabrina. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #89
And why not? zappaman Aug 2015 #94
Ha! Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #104
And when you're not good at something? sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #115
I will repeat this as politely as I can, I support the Labeling of our Food and I oppose sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #95
Post removed Post removed Aug 2015 #107
Again repeating a request that this poster refrain from addressing me, due to sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #111
Good lord, you are all over DU posting several dozen posts Sheepshank Aug 2015 #127
Results of your Jury Service Purveyor Aug 2015 #131
Project Much? Marty McGraw Aug 2015 #137
You said 'hypocrisy' first Marty McGraw Aug 2015 #136
Exactly LittleBlue Aug 2015 #85
Not Hillary at all. Lunabell Aug 2015 #19
+1 ... I agree. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #22
that may be a first. cali Aug 2015 #24
Is she behind this? ibegurpard Aug 2015 #30
I agree. tazkcmo Aug 2015 #32
This is sheer nonsense. MoonRiver Aug 2015 #44
her campaign was the one that began floating ibegurpard Aug 2015 #48
Total B.S. MoonRiver Aug 2015 #55
BLM is not a cohesive organization ibegurpard Aug 2015 #67
Exactly what evidence do you have of any association? MoonRiver Aug 2015 #130
Did you read my post? tazkcmo Aug 2015 #51
Sorry, I think I responded to the wrong post. MoonRiver Aug 2015 #61
That makes sense. tazkcmo Aug 2015 #65
Same here. :-) MoonRiver Aug 2015 #69
This message was self-deleted by its author Alkene Aug 2015 #34
Which is why it is simpler to take people at their word jberryhill Aug 2015 #35
I don't really care any more whether she's directly involved or not Doctor_J Aug 2015 #36
"Soros funding of BLM is not evidence."... DonViejo Aug 2015 #37
Most people tend not to respond in the best manner when they are insulted. It's human nature. jalan48 Aug 2015 #47
Sorry Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #52
And you passed it a long time ago ibegurpard Aug 2015 #53
Keep it up Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #58
Hillary is not behind the Black Lives Matter protests ibegurpard Aug 2015 #75
See... Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #86
and here we thought Marty McGraw Aug 2015 #138
Who the hell Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #140
Nixon didn't have clue on who Donald Segretti was Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #56
If Hillary gains anything from Bernie's engagement with BLM, it should be that she learns ancianita Aug 2015 #68
Problem with BLM Zoonart Aug 2015 #72
I'd like to draw a parallel that some may find annoying starroute Aug 2015 #77
I like that. bbgrunt Aug 2015 #145
I'd hate to have you working against me! Babel_17 Aug 2015 #147
I agree Cali. jalan48 Aug 2015 #80
I Smell A Rat Yallow Aug 2015 #88
Nice straw man you have there. EEO Aug 2015 #105
Sanders is about to be sunk by SJWs Prism Aug 2015 #129
a lot of the suspicion is also from the similar language to the Clinton side: if you're not MisterP Aug 2015 #134
Marissa Jenae does tweet under #BowDownBernie how is that less offensive than the one you mention? peacebird Aug 2015 #152
I agree, but I would add Vattel Aug 2015 #163
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»please just stop it.»Reply #106