2016 Postmortem

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)

38. The original image was from the AP

Thu Jul 16, 2015, 02:33 PM

Jul 2015

Powerline may have hosted a copy of the image which other sites could have linked to as well. Just because the image was hosted by Powerline does not mean the OP visited Powerline to obtain it. The image was originally put out by the AP, just because Powerline hosted a copy of that image on their server does not make it their image.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

143 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary's Poll numbers in free fall [View all] L0oniX Jul 2015 OP

LINK, please? That would be POWERLINE.com? The right wing blog? MADem Jul 2015 #1

It is not from Powerline, it is from the AP Bjorn Against Jul 2015 #2

The ORIGINAL LINK went to POWERLINE. MADem Jul 2015 #32

The original image was from the AP Bjorn Against Jul 2015 #38

The original LINK in the thread starting POST went to POWERLINE. MADem Jul 2015 #52

So what? Either it's wrong info or it isn't. If it's wrong, refute. merrily Jul 2015 #71

It's always wrong to link without attribution, or to post headlines without links. MADem Jul 2015 #94

I didn't advocate anything other than reducing meaningless knee jerk source shaming. merrily Jul 2015 #101

Unnnnh....yes, you did. Your words are not invisible. MADem Jul 2015 #104

See Reply 106, As usual, this got tedious fast. Last word is yours. merrily Jul 2015 #107

Hard truth is always tedious. nt MADem Jul 2015 #114

Is the information right or wrong? You have made several posts now about sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #143

Try this one: LWolf Jul 2015 #3

Yet she is handing the Rethuglicans their asses and that's all that matters to me DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #6

I think almost any Democratic candidate would do that. LWolf Jul 2015 #8

Yet the little polling we have shows Senator Sanders trailing the Republicans./nt DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #9

And, as you know, polls this far out are meaningless. However, merrily Jul 2015 #76

Yes and Bernie will handle em just fine. InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2015 #68

Hell ...Skittles could do that too. L0oniX Jul 2015 #18

Nice work. Being assidously ignored, though. merrily Jul 2015 #83

Concealing sources is shameFUL. If there was nothing to be ashamed of, why hide it? MADem Jul 2015 #86

In your mind. merrily Jul 2015 #88

Post 94. nt MADem Jul 2015 #96

AP is the source, is it not? Ed Suspicious Jul 2015 #90

Nooooo---the source of the DIRE headline, and the source of the posted jpg, was MADem Jul 2015 #98

I did. Maybe it was edited. Either way, don't kill the messenger. It was data derived from an Ed Suspicious Jul 2015 #109

No "maybe" about it--and the headline was lifted right off POWERLINE. MADem Jul 2015 #113

Surely you're not trying to distract from the fact that the OP used a far rightwing blog MADem Jul 2015 #121

Of course not. LWolf Jul 2015 #134

Ah yes--that "free fall" characterization from the right wing blog is just so "valid." MADem Jul 2015 #135

No matter what words you want to use, LWolf Jul 2015 #138

Not at all true, but the real bottom line is that people shouldn't use unattributed MADem Jul 2015 #139

So use all the links I provided. LWolf Jul 2015 #140

So what! It doesn't mean they won't vote for her. They will. yeoman6987 Jul 2015 #27

I think the use of right wing sources on this website -- particularly when they MADem Jul 2015 #29

Yes you are right. yeoman6987 Jul 2015 #30

Hell, they'll be posting shit from The Blaze before this is over with LordGlenconner Jul 2015 #53

The tortured defenses of this egregious conduct are what I find most amusing. MADem Jul 2015 #117

Only if the info is wrong, in which case it should be refuted. merrily Jul 2015 #78

Why am I not surprised? MADem Jul 2015 #82

I am not defending any source, simply objecting to meaningless, knee jerk source shaming. merrily Jul 2015 #85

Yes, you are--anyone can read your posts and see what you're saying. MADem Jul 2015 #102

Good grief. Yes, anyone can read my posts. So there's no need for you to pretend my posts say merrily Jul 2015 #106

Telling us "So what? ...refute" wingnut shit, from wingnut sources, does not support the MADem Jul 2015 #112

Is Politico right wing? senz Jul 2015 #74

Is the Pope Catholic? It's owned by the same family that kicked Bill Maher off ABC. MADem Jul 2015 #84

In all fairness ALMOST a third describe her as trustworthy!!! Indepatriot Jul 2015 #4

What a wonderful site you took that from. zappaman Jul 2015 #5

The image is not from Powerline it is from the AP Bjorn Against Jul 2015 #11

Top story on powerlineblog. zappaman Jul 2015 #12

Power Line cites the AP source Blus4u Jul 2015 #34

LOL, here's what else your "article" says.... R B Garr Jul 2015 #41

Use the data, not the shitty analysis from the site. The data doesn't lie, only the people Ed Suspicious Jul 2015 #72

Nice try. The article said what it said. R B Garr Jul 2015 #87

I didn't read the article, I can do my own analysis of polls, and don't need the help of Ed Suspicious Jul 2015 #110

It doesn't work that way. R B Garr Jul 2015 #120

What's wrong with Marty O'Malley? appalachiablue Jul 2015 #116

Is it just a coincidence then the title of your thread? Capt. Obvious Jul 2015 #13

Total coincidence! zappaman Jul 2015 #14

It is not my thread and it is not Powerline's graphic Bjorn Against Jul 2015 #15

You're right, not your thread Capt. Obvious Jul 2015 #16

Wrong, it was taken from the AP Bjorn Against Jul 2015 #19

No shit Capt. Obvious Jul 2015 #21

It looks like the OP edited out the image from Powerline sufrommich Jul 2015 #24

I see no reference to Powerline in the OP Bjorn Against Jul 2015 #25

That's because you didn't right click on the ORIGINAL (not the edited) image. MADem Jul 2015 #36

All that means is Powerline hosted a copy of the image on their server Bjorn Against Jul 2015 #42

You really ARE determined to die on that hill with the thread starter! MADem Jul 2015 #54

False, the OP did not have to read Powerline to get that image Bjorn Against Jul 2015 #60

NOT ONE INCH! Capt. Obvious Jul 2015 #64

You should really stop. Dawgs Jul 2015 #73

alert results irisblue Jul 2015 #128

You posted this in the wrong spot Capt. Obvious Jul 2015 #137

And he got the POWERLINE headline by magic, too? MADem Jul 2015 #115

Here, I made pictures for you Capt. Obvious Jul 2015 #37

All that means is that Powerline hosted a copy of the image on their server Bjorn Against Jul 2015 #43

You're really going to die on that hill eh? Capt. Obvious Jul 2015 #45

No it is not their own image Bjorn Against Jul 2015 #48

such a weird stand you're taking Capt. Obvious Jul 2015 #51

And an ignominious death it is, too. MADem Jul 2015 #50

The Sanders Enforcement Committee redstateblues Jul 2015 #130

The OP seems to have bailed, I only see one reply. Agschmid Jul 2015 #56

Can ya blame him? zappaman Jul 2015 #58

Nope. Agschmid Jul 2015 #59

The OP took the image from Powerline. That is obvious from the edit history. nt MADem Jul 2015 #35

The headline too. nt sufrommich Jul 2015 #39

Yes ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2015 #7

Ahh, the Bezos Billionaire's Gazette. moondust Jul 2015 #10

+1 L0oniX Jul 2015 #17

Now, that you got your "Yup" on ... care to comment on the numbers ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2015 #81

Sure. moondust Jul 2015 #95

But you rec the posts about polls indicating that Bernie is surging? n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2015 #105

I don't remember doing that. moondust Jul 2015 #111

It does seem like a lot of anti Hillary stuff goes on here at DU....rightwingers do hate her. randys1 Jul 2015 #31

My Take on Hillary- dirtydickcheney Jul 2015 #20

She won't be encouraging a reinstatement of Glass-Steagall. L0oniX Jul 2015 #22

Doesn't matter if people "like" her.....they want to "vote for" her. brooklynite Jul 2015 #33

And the number if people wanting to vote for her are declining steadily. London Lover Man Jul 2015 #46

Actually no, I don't brooklynite Jul 2015 #55

Go ahead and have Clinton raise billions London Lover Man Jul 2015 #93

A year of Clinton polling="no imact"; a month of Sanders ="dynamic change". brooklynite Jul 2015 #97

You do know we can see your edits right? Capt. Obvious Jul 2015 #23

+1. nt sufrommich Jul 2015 #26

He was hoping otherwise, I'd imagine....!! MADem Jul 2015 #40

Right? zappaman Jul 2015 #49

BWAHAHAHAHAHA! JaneyVee Jul 2015 #28

Heh! ismnotwasm Jul 2015 #44

Not at all surprising, if places like POWERLINE tout them!!! MADem Jul 2015 #47

The top two polls are Reuters and YouGov K lib Jul 2015 #57

You do realize that Jesuits are some of the most intellectually rigorous people on this earth? MADem Jul 2015 #61

Look under GFK Group nt K lib Jul 2015 #66

GfK Group is NOT AP-GfK. GfK Group is the parent agency. MADem Jul 2015 #70

Perhaps I made a mistake K lib Jul 2015 #100

WAPO and Boston Globe used to be a lot better than they are, now. MADem Jul 2015 #118

From his link Capt. Obvious Jul 2015 #67

Look upthread--GfK Group is NOT AP-GfK. MADem Jul 2015 #80

I would love this kind of freefall in my personal life. Dear Lord. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #62

AP/GfK polling is at the bottom of list for accuracy... riversedge Jul 2015 #63

Not sure how you win a general election starting with unfavorables that high. pa28 Jul 2015 #65

Fortunately, Bernie will be our nominee and is a true progressive whom we can all unite behind. InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2015 #91

I'm torn, because while I love feeling the Bern, and I will complain about Hillary here in our home, Ed Suspicious Jul 2015 #69

7 points in 3 months doesn't seem like a freefall, Chemisse Jul 2015 #75

Wow. There is a lot of stupidity (or maybe just ignorance) in this thread. Dawgs Jul 2015 #77

Free fall? HassleCat Jul 2015 #79

Maybe? It's Bernie's time...it's gonna happen...count on it! InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2015 #89

It's time to try HassleCat Jul 2015 #92

Yes, it is VERY nice that people are beginning to wake up senz Jul 2015 #122

Hmm, she is feeling the Bern. Lunabell Jul 2015 #99

She's feelin the Bern alright. Hillary's doing her best to channel Bernie, but it doesn't come of as authentic. People can see right through her phony progressive schtick. InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2015 #108

+1 L0oniX Jul 2015 #142

Wishful thinking does not make it true. n/t Lil Missy Jul 2015 #103

This message was self-deleted by its author senz Jul 2015 #119

Nevermind, I see that it is in fact the same. Sorry, will delete my redundant comment. senz Jul 2015 #125

I think its simply the Bernie supporters skewing the numbers. DCBob Jul 2015 #123

He wasn't "left out." Read the link. senz Jul 2015 #127

So what were Bernie's numbers? DCBob Jul 2015 #131

Another thread I read just this morning said her fav. numbers had just jumped up FiveGoodMen Jul 2015 #124

This appears to be a garbage poll. DCBob Jul 2015 #132

Her biggest problem is that she's boring LittleBlue Jul 2015 #126

Send this to Frank Luntz... Mike Nelson Jul 2015 #129

This is a garbage poll.. DCBob Jul 2015 #133

HA! This vaunted pollster couldn't even BOTHER TO INCLUDE Bernie!!!! MADem Jul 2015 #136

Hoe did AP=GfK polling compare in 2012? thevoiceofreason Jul 2015 #141