Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
16. I go to intent. They aren't cowardly. They aren't feckless. They are paid:
Thu Oct 30, 2014, 10:38 AM
Oct 2014
Venality is a vice associated with being bribeable or of selling one's services or power, especially when one should act justly instead. In its most recognizable form, dishonesty, venality causes people to lie and steal for their personal advantage, and is related to bribery and nepotism, among other vices.

Venality in its mild form is a vice notable especially among those with government or military careers. In these fields, one is supposed to act with justice and honor and not accept bribes. That ensures that the organization is not susceptible to self-interested parties.

The Oxford English Dictionary[1] defines it as:

1. The quality or fact of being for sale.
2. The quality of being venal; readiness to give support or favour in return for profit or reward; prostitution of talents or principles for mercenary considerations.


In contrast to the previous interpretation, dishonesty is not specifically expressed in the literal meaning, but is often implied. The condition of failing to act justly is not a literal component of the word's meaning either. By definition, committing "venal" acts does not indicate "stealing" or "lying", but rather suggests a consensual arrangement, perhaps without conscience or regard for consequences, but is not synonymous with stealing. While bribery could be related, nepotism clearly has no literal similarity or correlation with venality. Though venality is generally used as a pejorative term, an individual or entity could be venal (or mercenary) and not be corrupt or unethical. One could perform one's duties or job in a perfunctory manner in order to collect a wage or payment, or prostitute one's time or skills for monetary or material gain, without necessarily being dishonest.

Much contemporary use of the words venal or venality is applied to modern professional athletes, particularly baseball, basketball, American football, and soccer players all around the world. The implication being that the highly paid players are essentially "hired guns" with no allegiance to any team or city, and are motivated solely by the acquisition of material wealth.

For people to accept settlements and legislation, the acts of the government must be seen as just. This perception enhances the legitimacy of the government. Venality is a term often used with reference to pre-revolutionary France, where it describes the then-widespread practice of selling administrative positions within the government to the highest bidder, especially regarding the Nobles of the Robe.

Thus, for example, venality was a charge for which, in part, Danton and others were executed during the Terror.

Several so-called Reality TV programs have been criticized for their promotion of venal behavior; specifically Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Millionaire?, in which fifty women competed to marry a presumed multi-millionaire who was shown only in silhouette. The premise that the contestants would compete to marry an unseen stranger for no other reason than his wealth would be an example of venality.

"Venality" used in a pejorative but accurate sense, is used when describing apparent acts of care with an ulterior mercenary motive. An example is where one of a number of children seeks to care for his or her elderly parents, outwardly presenting compassion, but at the same time securing for himself or herself, access to and ultimate control of a greater share of income and assets than such person would be entitled to on a pro-rata distribution.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venality

The media enjoys one of the powerful positions in our country as defined by the First Amendment to the US Constitution. It has the power to influence voters to do good and bad things, and for many years they have been very bad ones that benefit the 1%.

We no longer have public media nor an obligation imposed on them to insure they are fair and honest. They deny us facts and give us fiction and lead us to act increasingly in anti-social ways. In my opinion, they are more dangerous than any other group in society.

Since the most powerful are now in the hands of a few right wing plutocrats, they only promote their interests, not the truth in any matter. Even advertisements are designed to keep us in a mindset that is against good outcomes.

What people do not realize when they refuse to vote, is that they are complicit in the process. Our vote is what they fear the most and our government is what they fear the most, so they are destroying it like termites, from the ground up. People don't understood how powerful as individuals they are when they vote, how they could change lives. The stakes are high which is why media is paid billions to influence us.

The whole country is on the auction block with every single election all year long and each word from media is to influence us. I have been paying attention to the media and its effects on the feelings and thinking processes it engenders. The farther we have gotten away from the public sphere and public good in media, the worse we have become as a nation. Media is the major medium for forming beliefs and directing behavior.





Or was it the redistricting of 2010? WhiteTara Oct 2014 #1
that certainly has a big impact on the house, but it doesn't explain the senate unblock Oct 2014 #4
it was the lack of turnout that did it. the maps can be drawn and redrawn at anytime belzabubba333 Oct 2014 #6
They've ckeverly exploited the cognitive dissonance COLGATE4 Oct 2014 #2
When Pres. Obama was elected and the repugs started the obstruction I thought... Bonhomme Richard Oct 2014 #3
not so much a matter of stupidity when the republicans control the microphones. unblock Oct 2014 #7
Sadly, I have come to understand they ARE that stupid Cosmocat Oct 2014 #17
HOw much do people know of the obstruction? Since Obama was elected the word "filibuster" has been Bill USA Oct 2014 #18
If polls are right Robbins Oct 2014 #5
Republicans are followers and they'll continue to follow... polichick Oct 2014 #8
A photo to make you smile at this link. Bethune Cookman students marching to vote today in Florida. flpoljunkie Oct 2014 #9
Nice to see such things in my beloved home state of Floriduh! polichick Oct 2014 #10
Their goal has been to get people to hate government. And its working. JoePhilly Oct 2014 #11
Aided and abetted by a feckless, cowardly media flpoljunkie Oct 2014 #12
Although I'd use the word venal to describe the media. freshwest Oct 2014 #13
You're right. I was too kind. flpoljunkie Oct 2014 #14
I go to intent. They aren't cowardly. They aren't feckless. They are paid: freshwest Oct 2014 #16
Absolutely correct. JoePhilly Oct 2014 #15
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Will the Republicans' del...»Reply #16