Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

question everything

(47,444 posts)

5. I understand this

Reply to Joe941 (Reply #4)

Wed Jan 18, 2017, 11:31 AM

Jan 2017

and this is why I don't think that the EC should be abolished altogether. But I think that it should be tweaked to be more proportionally to the population, as members of the house are apportioned.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The electoral college [View all] question everything Jan 2017 OP

It still requires an amendment to the Constitution... Wounded Bear Jan 2017 #1

Right. Congress can only change the number of EVs by changing the number of House seats FBaggins Jan 2017 #6

I haven't checked but wouldn't that require a constitutional ammendment? TexasProgresive Jan 2017 #2

You would need 3/4 th's of the state legislatures to agree to make that change Yupster Jan 2017 #3

We really don't know how things would have played out... Joe941 Jan 2017 #4

I understand this question everything Jan 2017 #5

Either way you are asking small states to cede more power to the large states Lurks Often Jan 2017 #8

true, but in general the reds have more "small" states, so they definitely will not let the EC go, o TheFrenchRazor Jan 2017 #10

They already do. Because they are more populous question everything Jan 2017 #11

The EC isn't going anywhere anytime soon Lurks Often Jan 2017 #13

If I had my way Exilednight Jan 2017 #7

I like this idea (nt) question everything Jan 2017 #12

eliminate the EC, or blue states should just secede. nt TheFrenchRazor Jan 2017 #9