Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
15. from past experience, I have little faith in truth meters and their methodologies.
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 04:37 AM
Jan 2017

When you get into the weeds of policies, their interpretation is as good as anybody else's. What information did they leave out when they crunched the numbers? What numbers did they privilege over others? At what point did they stop digging and just go with what they had? What is their own lens?

Wouldn't it be weird if they tended to have a moderate point of reference when it comes to some of this? I know i'd be colored surprised. Yes, facts are facts. Once you dive into "mostly falses" and "half-truths" you have left the objective path, and entered the realm of personal judgement, wouldn't you say?
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Remember: 53 % of Sanders...»Reply #15