Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

question everything

(47,486 posts)
Tue Jan 17, 2017, 02:30 PM Jan 2017

The electoral college [View all]

Before we put this forum to rest, we may want to think about the electoral college.

No, it will not be abolished. Not any time soon.

But there was a lot of talk about the disproportional power of small state. One reason is because each state has two senators, whether it is Wyoming and Vermont with about 600,000 people, or California with 38 million.

It would not have changed the results this time, but I think that we need to change the number of electors to 435, the same as the members of congress.

Thus, the Dakotas, Wyoming and Montana each will have 1 vote, instead of 3.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The electoral college»Reply #0