Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

potone

(1,701 posts)
73. The real question now is how do we keep this from happening again?
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 12:47 AM
Jan 2017

This election was unlike any I have seen in my lifetime, and I am no spring chicken. Think back to the beginning of the primaries. No one expected that Trump would end up being the Republican nominee, including him. The Republican establishment openly despised him and didn't take him seriously. But they didn't have the means to stop him (aka pre-pledged super delegates), and they only realized too late that it was no longer enough to promise a platform all about guns, abortion, God and gays. They thought that they could continue to ignore the anger of their constituents at their failure to do anything to benefit them, and finally they got a giant FU response in return from the Republicans who voted for Trump.

On the Democratic side, the simple fact is that Hillary didn't excite the voters. Yes, she won the popular vote, and yes, the Republicans had done everything possible to reduce the number of Democrats who voted–or whose vote counted–but even so, based on her experience, Hillary should have won by a landslide.

It seems to me that the Democrats need to wake up and face the fact that there is an increasing feeling of economic insecurity in this country, and we cannot expect to start winning again until we address that. And NO, I am not saying that we should ignore social justice issues, of course not. But we need to face head on the fact of the enormous shift of wealth in this country upward over the last 35 years, thanks to a tax system based on an absurd economic premise that lowering taxes on the wealthy benefits everyone. The failure of that supply-side economic theory has been proven over and over and over again to be wrong, but it is a zombie that simply will not stay in its grave.

Bill Clinton presided over a booming economy, and he did raise taxes on the wealthy, which is what motivated the Republicans to impeach him. But he also continued the deregulation mania started by Reagan in ways that ultimately led to the financial meltdown of 2008. What people saw in Hillary was more of that, combined with a foreign policy that scared them.

We all think that Hillary would have made a far better president than Trump can ever hope to be, but we must remember that most people vote on the basis of emotion, not rationality, and what they saw in Hillary was the same old establishment that seems totally removed from the lives of most Americans, and what they saw in Trump was someone who wasn't beholden to corporate sponsors who would be an independent voice for them. We all know that Trump cares only about himself and his family, but for now we are stuck with him, and, armed with a Republican Congress and–horror of horrors–the potential to reshape the Supreme Court, it is hard to imagine the limits of the harm he could do.

So please, everyone, let us set aside our feelings about the primaries. The only point in addressing them is to seek to avoid the mistakes of the last one, which should be apparent to all by now (if they are not, it is not for lack of information), and to focus on how we can hinder Trump from getting his way and to take steps to insure having a more reliable voting process in the future. Not doing anything about how are elections are conducted is the great mistake the Democrats made after 2000. As well, of course, as being wimps.

Obama was right, albeit far too late, in telling the Democrats not to try to work with Trump. He must be resisted across the board (unless, out of sheer incompetence, he manages to come up with a constructive policy. The best medical advice is not to hold your breath waiting for that. )

This is a national emergency: we must be willing to do everything lawful to resist Trump and what he represents.

See you at the barricades!
Potone

Wuda Shuda Cuda WhiteTara Jan 2017 #1
Post removed Post removed Jan 2017 #6
what ever cheating you feel went on bernie couldnt win the primary Ohioblue22 Jan 2017 #15
So they are so corrupt that they cheat even when they don't need to? n/t Motown_Johnny Jan 2017 #18
It's in their nature. They can't help it. It's who they are. brush Jan 2017 #63
He couldn't win the primary with Debbie Schultz in that drivers seat..n/t monmouth4 Jan 2017 #21
He couldn't win the primary with asshat Jeff Weaver in the driver's seat emulatorloo Jan 2017 #24
Yeah, Bernie saw no growth in support or popularity TDale313 Jan 2017 #59
AA, Latinos, Jewish voters, etc? What did Weaver do to bring those voters to Bernie? emulatorloo Jan 2017 #120
the all-powerful shultz did it .... ok......nt Ohioblue22 Jan 2017 #31
+1000 putitinD Jan 2017 #76
The DNC had nothing to do with Sanders being soundly rejected by Jewish, African American and Latino Gothmog Jan 2017 #88
They cheated by getting more votes? WhiteTara Jan 2017 #19
Never again. He trashed the party all through the primaries and then wouldn't concede when beaten brush Jan 2017 #65
My feelings too. WhiteTara Jan 2017 #67
Re: He is STILL trashing the Party SFnomad Jan 2017 #68
I agree completely. Demsrule86 Jan 2017 #146
Point to specific actions that the DNC took to "cheat." emulatorloo Jan 2017 #25
Donna Brazile fed debate questions to Hillary. Qutzupalotl Jan 2017 #35
That was during the general in a debate with trump. Frankly, I have no problem with that. brush Jan 2017 #69
No, it was the primary debate in Flint. Qutzupalotl Jan 2017 #80
The incident I'm talking about was a debate with trump brush Jan 2017 #82
Link is unrelated Qutzupalotl Jan 2017 #85
Ignoring a fact does make it go away Gothmog Jan 2017 #87
The DNC recommended the staffer involved Qutzupalotl Jan 2017 #89
Sanders people still illegally took Clinton data Gothmog Jan 2017 #91
The DNC was supposed to provide a firewall Qutzupalotl Jan 2017 #94
Ahhhh ... no. The Sanders campaign broke through the firewall brush Jan 2017 #96
There was no firewall to break through. Qutzupalotl Jan 2017 #97
That's not how I remember it. But why did the Sanders campaign take the info, firewall or not? brush Jan 2017 #98
Because the DNC had ignored their reports about this issue Qutzupalotl Jan 2017 #108
So they took the info to prove it could be taken? O-k-a-a-a-a-a-y! brush Jan 2017 #116
And Bernie fired them for it. Qutzupalotl Jan 2017 #117
And he should have fired Jeff Weaver as well emulatorloo Jan 2017 #121
Weaver sued the DNC to restore Sanders' access to his own data. Qutzupalotl Jan 2017 #122
He sued because he's a hot-head and a monumental fuck-up emulatorloo Jan 2017 #123
He sued because the DNC cut off Bernie's access to his own data. Qutzupalotl Jan 2017 #124
I didn't say or intend to say you did. emulatorloo Jan 2017 #125
OK, but imagine if he did not sue. Qutzupalotl Jan 2017 #127
Of course! emulatorloo Jan 2017 #128
I think it's creative how hold two different standards LanternWaste Jan 2017 #143
There were ethical breaches on both sides Qutzupalotl Jan 2017 #144
Which has NADA to do with Sanders. Lil Missy Jan 2017 #107
That would be true if they fed him the debate questions too. Qutzupalotl Jan 2017 #109
He was not in that debate, nor did he EVER debate Trump. Sanders lost the Primary ... remember? Lil Missy Jan 2017 #110
He was in the debate in Flint where Hillary was fed a question in advance. Qutzupalotl Jan 2017 #111
Donna has denied that actually...but when I heard the questions she supposedly Demsrule86 Jan 2017 #147
It was obvious to any objective observer the games played over the debates. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2017 #53
I'm really not sure why Sanders felt the need to cheat. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #72
If by "they" you mean the Democratic Party, they did not cheat. synergie Jan 2017 #84
Millions of "Democrats" disagreed. n/t Tarheel_Dem Jan 2017 #2
Sigh mcar Jan 2017 #3
Geez. Make it stop already. eom Blanks Jan 2017 #4
Yes, he still would have won. Motown_Johnny Jan 2017 #5
Yes, I think he would have, too mtnsnake Jan 2017 #7
I think Free Trade is what sunk Hillary. Motown_Johnny Jan 2017 #8
What happened to Russ Feingold, Zypher Teachout, and every Democrat running for Senate in those still_one Jan 2017 #11
You will get crickets on this pertinent question mcar Jan 2017 #40
The democratic base had depressed voter turnout in those states. killbotfactory Jan 2017 #48
not a bad analysis in my opinion, and definitely contributory still_one Jan 2017 #49
FBI Putin Assange WhiteTara Jan 2017 #54
He lost because millions of people WhiteTara Jan 2017 #20
So you would have voted against Bernie in the General Election? Motown_Johnny Jan 2017 #30
You do know what assume means, don't you? WhiteTara Jan 2017 #51
Same here. Along with 4 million other democrats liquid diamond Jan 2017 #34
Lets see, lost primary, zypher teachout and Russ feingold heavily endorsed by Bernie lost, and every still_one Jan 2017 #9
So you're blaming Bernie Sanders for all those losses? mtnsnake Jan 2017 #13
No, I am refuting the speculation of those who say Bernie would have won, and for those still_one Jan 2017 #23
The best measurement of electability that we have is favorability. Motown_Johnny Jan 2017 #32
Sorry, Hillary got more votes, and the bullshit from people like greg palast who falsely still_one Jan 2017 #38
Trump won because of sexism and racism mcar Jan 2017 #41
So Bernie would have had parity with Trump HoneyBadger Jan 2017 #103
I have my doubts that Sanders would have won. hrmjustin Jan 2017 #10
There's no facts to back up Bernie would have beaten trump FloridaBlues Jan 2017 #12
Because... WhiteTara Jan 2017 #22
To divide Democrats. baldguy Jan 2017 #36
At least we still have Bernie in the Senate HockeyMom Jan 2017 #14
well you think that all you want doesnt make it so. bernie is a socialist who said our taxes Ohioblue22 Jan 2017 #16
No, he wouldn't have beaten Trump, the real question is why you guys keep synergie Jan 2017 #17
Excellent post... LenaBaby61 Jan 2017 #37
Exactly. This attacking the Democrats who voted, Hillary supporters and the DNC synergie Jan 2017 #83
Thank you. And to Hillary's credit she didn't use the negative oppo research against Sanders, . . . brush Jan 2017 #100
They seem to spend more time bashing Democrats and Hillary than Trump, GOP or Putin. synergie Jan 2017 #118
I think you are over-thinking. Really - does the "republican base" give a shit who trump jmg257 Jan 2017 #26
He would have beaten Trump the same way Russ Feingold beat Ron Johnson emulatorloo Jan 2017 #27
good point. and russ feingold lost to johnson by several percentage points, while Hillary lost still_one Jan 2017 #39
Young people stayed home in Wisconsin in the ge. You can't pin that on Bernie. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2017 #50
Lol, I'm not "pinning" anything on Bernie. Just pointing out that OP's reasoning is faulty emulatorloo Jan 2017 #75
You are pretending the top of the ticket doesn't have a huge influence down ballot. Ridiculous Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2017 #81
I'm not "pretending" anything. emulatorloo Jan 2017 #119
Oh, ffs! This is getting pathetic. Sissyk Jan 2017 #28
I think Bernie would have gotten alot of republicans votes. putitinD Jan 2017 #77
True. and all the Dems who voted for Trump. ciaobaby Jan 2017 #129
Will this stuff ever end? n/t rzemanfl Jan 2017 #29
No BS wouldn't have won if he had ever made it out of the primaries. Cha Jan 2017 #33
This has got to stop Saviolo Jan 2017 #42
Thank you! Cha Jan 2017 #43
I'm thinking about making it an OP Saviolo Jan 2017 #44
Do it! Cha Jan 2017 #45
Thanks! Saviolo Jan 2017 #46
The DNC had nothing to do with the fact that Jewish, African American and Latino voters rejected Gothmog Jan 2017 #130
Its obvious that some folks NanceGreggs Jan 2017 #47
This Postmortem thing needs to end. Well said, Nance. n/t rzemanfl Jan 2017 #52
It sure does still_one Jan 2017 #56
................................................... still_one Jan 2017 #55
Perfect. Thank you! n/t VOX Jan 2017 #62
Fairy tales?? Hahaha, look who's talking, the matriarch of fairy tales and fables herself! mtnsnake Jan 2017 #64
I have never claimed that Hillary won the election. NanceGreggs Jan 2017 #71
Hallelujah! I'm glad to hear you admit that Hillary lost mtnsnake Jan 2017 #93
When did I not admit it? NanceGreggs Jan 2017 #131
Oh yeah. Cha Jan 2017 #74
Yep Gothmog Jan 2017 #90
Trump would have crushed Sanders Grey Lemercier Jan 2017 #57
BERNIE LOST Maven Jan 2017 #58
She DID beat Trump, and here we are. ucrdem Jan 2017 #60
Sure she did. That's why everyone's talking about President-elect Clinton, right? mtnsnake Jan 2017 #66
This dead horse isn't going to resurrect itself... VOX Jan 2017 #61
. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #70
The real question now is how do we keep this from happening again? potone Jan 2017 #73
Bernie walks on water, too! SharonClark Jan 2017 #78
Beaten him at what? Jakes Progress Jan 2017 #79
Good points, especially about the baggage thing mtnsnake Jan 2017 #95
And beginning in March or April Jakes Progress Jan 2017 #115
Sanders was on the ballot in 2016 and under performed Clinton Gothmog Jan 2017 #86
We will never know. However, what we do know is that Clinton lost to Trump. jalan48 Jan 2017 #92
We can't know that Sanders would have won. Orsino Jan 2017 #99
Would it have made a difference with both houses of Congress being republican? no_hypocrisy Jan 2017 #101
He didn't win enough votes in the primary. Historic NY Jan 2017 #102
Understand what you are saying there. That said; I really do not think Clinton could have beaten a Alekzander Jan 2017 #104
Only one way to settle this HoneyBadger Jan 2017 #105
No reason to read beyond the subject line. Lil Missy Jan 2017 #106
But you obviously did read beyond it mtnsnake Jan 2017 #112
Actually, I didn't. But if such delusion comforts you, so be it. Lil Missy Jan 2017 #113
Okay I'll take your word for it. mtnsnake Jan 2017 #114
Why even bring this up again? radical noodle Jan 2017 #126
So you must think that the oligarchs in Russia would have preferred Bernie pnwmom Jan 2017 #132
100% your words, not mine mtnsnake Jan 2017 #133
Why do you think that the Russian oligarchs wouldn't have interfered pnwmom Jan 2017 #134
There's nothing about Russia in my post, so either you meant to post that in a different thread mtnsnake Jan 2017 #135
You are desperately trying to IGNORE Russia, but in the real world we can't. pnwmom Jan 2017 #136
You are desperately trying to hijack a thread again by getting it off subject. mtnsnake Jan 2017 #137
You can't truthfully state that Russia wasn't part of the 2016 election. pnwmom Jan 2017 #138
Obviously, I never did state that. mtnsnake Jan 2017 #139
I agree. Emotion tends to thwart good intellectual points. snowy owl Jan 2017 #140
Nope, Bernie Sanders would not have beaten Trump, but the real question is zappaman Jan 2017 #141
Nope, Trump beats Sanders easily and here is why stevenleser Jan 2017 #142
If Bernie could not win a primary, he was never going to win an election. Demsrule86 Jan 2017 #145
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Yes, Bernie Sanders would...»Reply #73