Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

portlander23

(2,078 posts)
Thu Jan 5, 2017, 11:43 AM Jan 2017

Registered Voters Who Stayed Home Probably Cost Clinton The Election [View all]

Registered Voters Who Stayed Home Probably Cost Clinton The Election
Harry Enten
FiveThirtyEight

Registered voters who didn’t vote on Election Day in November were more Democratic-leaning than the registered voters who turned out, according to a post-election poll from SurveyMonkey, shared with FiveThirtyEight. In fact, Donald Trump probably would have lost to Hillary Clinton had Republican- and Democratic-leaning registered voters cast ballots at equal rates.

Given how closely party identification tracks with vote choice, the disparity in turnout probably cost Clinton the election. SurveyMonkey did not ask non-voters whom they would have voted for, but we do know that more than 90 percent of self-identified Democrats who cast a ballot voted for Clinton and more than 90 percent of Republicans voted for Trump. Moreover, voters who didn’t identify with or lean towards either party were slightly more likely to prefer Clinton to Trump. That means that had the non-voters cast a ballot in accordance with their party identification, Clinton’s advantage over Trump nationally would have expanded by about 2 to 3 percentage points. That almost certainly would have been enough to flip enough states for her to win the Electoral College.

The biggest reason given by non-voters for staying home was that they didn’t like the candidates. Clinton and Trump both had favorable ratings in the low 30s among registered voters who didn’t cast a ballot — both had ratings in the low 40s among those who did vote. That’s a pretty sizable difference. So why was Clinton hurt more by non-voters? Trump was able to win, in large part, because voters who disliked both candidates favored him in big numbers, according to the exit polls. Clinton, apparently, couldn’t get those who disliked both candidates — and who may have been more favorably disposed to her candidacy — to turn out and vote.

More harmful for Clinton was which young voters stayed home: minorities. Among white voters, voters 18-29 years old made up 30 percent of voters who did not participate in the November election. Among young Hispanic voters, that climbs to 43 percent. Among young black voters, it was an even higher 46 percent. That generally matches the findings of the voter data released in some Southern states showing that young black voters were especially likely to stay home in this election. Younger black voters were far more likely to support Bernie Sanders in the primary, suggesting that there simply was not the enthusiasm for Clinton’s candidacy as there was for Obama’s in 2012. Clinton’s favorable rating, for instance, was about 10 percentage points lower among the youngest black voters compared to the oldest black voters in the SurveyMonkey poll.

78 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stay at homes .......? suston96 Jan 2017 #1
Yup. I know 4 or 5 passionate Sanders supporters who stayed home. lamp_shade Jan 2017 #2
Please slap them all in the face with a dead trout for me... Blue_Tires Jan 2017 #12
They're all family... all very young adults... probably not even registered to vote. lamp_shade Jan 2017 #22
Election losses in this country are often sharp_stick Jan 2017 #3
Comey cast more doubt and many people just gave up and stayed home. riversedge Jan 2017 #4
Nah! Not buying it. brush Jan 2017 #5
The 538 analysis is based on actual polling data. Jim Lane Jan 2017 #20
How do you exit poll non-voters? brush Jan 2017 #21
You're confusing two different concepts Jim Lane Jan 2017 #24
++++ NO !!!! ++++ Clinton got nearly as many votes as 2012 Obama !!! uponit7771 Jan 2017 #6
True, but the population of registered voters increases each year as well karynnj Jan 2017 #18
Thanks for nothing, stay-at-homes. (nt) Paladin Jan 2017 #7
Ok. So why do those of us who are angry at Bernie for attacking her get shit for that? kcr Jan 2017 #8
Because it makes the assumption.... vi5 Jan 2017 #10
Nothing in this says that they would have been motivated to vote for HRC had there been no primary karynnj Jan 2017 #19
Agreed. Never again let a non-Dem with no allegiance to the party run as a Dem brush Jan 2017 #23
I hope the DNC implements this policy liquid diamond Jan 2017 #43
Yes! brush Jan 2017 #44
Yeah... that's a great solution kenfrequed Jan 2017 #47
You and your types liquid diamond Jan 2017 #49
"My types"? kenfrequed Jan 2017 #63
Well said! LiberalLovinLug Jan 2017 #77
Perfect example of our losing strategy. HassleCat Jan 2017 #76
Post removed Post removed Jan 2017 #62
Your concern is noted hueymahl Jan 2017 #72
Agreed HRC2020 Jan 2017 #57
CNNventional wisdom that's been kicked to the curb daily for two months. nt ucrdem Jan 2017 #9
It is Politics 101 earthside Jan 2017 #11
who the fuck has to be inspired to vote . keeping trump out of the white house wasnt inspiring Ohioblue22 Jan 2017 #15
Being registered to vote and subsequently voting should be inspiring enough. Iggo Jan 2017 #29
they take it for granted Ohioblue22 Jan 2017 #30
Only a narcissist has to be "inspired to vote" - especially with Trump as the alternative. yardwork Jan 2017 #50
BernieBro eom HRC2020 Jan 2017 #59
Well, I hope they ellie Jan 2017 #13
Peer Pressure Is A Powerful Tool otohara Jan 2017 #14
Those assholes will get theirs. liquid diamond Jan 2017 #45
This really isn't true, and blaming it on "minorities" makes it worse. ucrdem Jan 2017 #16
You are using two different numbers. kenfrequed Jan 2017 #48
Clinton and the DNC did not help themselves, but they still should have been able to beat Trump, and JCanete Jan 2017 #17
Clinton just didn't inspire the young voters as seen by these numbers. jalan48 Jan 2017 #25
The young voters that BS "inspired" couldn't be bothered to come out and vote for BS SFnomad Jan 2017 #34
Let's face it-Hillary as inspirational wasn't happening. jalan48 Jan 2017 #35
And that isn't why she lost. If that's all it took, BS would have won the primary SFnomad Jan 2017 #38
Given how late he started and with no money-it's anybody's guess. jalan48 Jan 2017 #39
FFS, you people sure do have one excuse after another #smh SFnomad Jan 2017 #42
Hillary Inspired Millions of Young Women.. I know a lot of BS fans Cha Jan 2017 #51
Yeah, maybe next time we'll put country above ego? Just a reminder; JTFrog Jan 2017 #58
I guess you need to tell that to the people who didn't vote or are we still blaming the voters? jalan48 Jan 2017 #60
Because we had a spoiler drumming up division. Not really that hard to pinpoint. nt JTFrog Jan 2017 #61
Take a look at the candidate's favorability ratings. jalan48 Jan 2017 #64
It wasn't close. She won by 3 million votes. JTFrog Jan 2017 #65
If she won by 3 million votes why isn't she the President then? jalan48 Jan 2017 #66
Russia. Comey. GOP. Duh. nt JTFrog Jan 2017 #67
Russia, Comey and the GOP made voters stay home? Wow! It's hopeless then. jalan48 Jan 2017 #68
Fake news and hacking from Russia. Division from the spoiler. Comey and his fake announcement. JTFrog Jan 2017 #69
It's everyone else's fault is the message then. Got it. jalan48 Jan 2017 #70
Whatever helps you sleep at night. nt JTFrog Jan 2017 #71
Victim-hood is a losing mindset. It will only lead to more losses. jalan48 Jan 2017 #74
Yes, because ignoring all of the things that actually happened is a winning strategy. JTFrog Jan 2017 #75
Which begs the question of why that 41% did not vote. guillaumeb Jan 2017 #26
I stayed home that day. TonyPDX Jan 2017 #27
Registered voters who stayed home are fucking morons. Iggo Jan 2017 #28
They will have blood on their hands mcar Jan 2017 #31
"The biggest reason given by non-voters for staying home was that they didnt like the candidates." andym Jan 2017 #32
She had a 3 million vote lead over Trump. Rex Jan 2017 #33
They cost us dearly. Not Clinton. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #36
Clear support for candidates was low so why didn't DNC get a candidate who could garner more? snowy owl Jan 2017 #37
The voters of the Democratic Party picked Clinton, and by a wide margin at that. StevieM Jan 2017 #52
But, But They at Least Preserved Their Ideological Purity Hum Jan 2017 #40
Does this include voters who wanted/tried to vote but were prevented from doing so by suppression EffieBlack Jan 2017 #41
and RUSSIA? LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #46
Flagged for Review? You Better Believe it! FSogol Jan 2017 #53
Like all things, way too late. JTFrog Jan 2017 #55
Yep I sit next to a Sanders supporter jzodda Jan 2017 #54
There's not really any single cause. Orsino Jan 2017 #56
Reason 5,236 from the North West. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #73
So whether you hate Sanders or love Sanders, its agreed he would have won. LiberalLovinLug Jan 2017 #78
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Registered Voters Who Sta...»Reply #0